6 (a) - Laserfiche WebLink

attached to this report as Attachment 9, Exhibit H, and was also published in the local newspaper. After the Planning Commission hearing, staff has received several emails in regard to this project. The full text of these emails is attached to this report as Attachment 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT On January 4, 2012, the City Council certified a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) and adopted the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Housing Element update and Climate Action Plan General Plan Amendment and Rezonings. This SEIR was a supplement to the EIR prepared for the Pleasanton 2005-2025 General Plan which was certified in July 2009. The subject property was one of 21 potential housing sites analyzed in the SEIR. Up to 345 multi-family housing units and 59,000 sq. ft. of retail space were analyzed in the SEIR for this site. Under CEQA, once an EIR has been prepared for a project, the lead agency (in this case, the City) is not required to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR unless certain conditions are met as specified in CEQA. Staff believed that the conditions described in CEQA have not occurred and that a subsequent or supplemental EIR was not required for this project. CEQA further states that a lead agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. Therefore, an addendum to the SEIR was prepared for this project. The analysis in the Addendum to the SEIR (Attachment 9, Exhibit E) determined that the proposed project will not trigger any new or more severe significant environmental impacts as compared to those analyzed in the context of the SEIR and confirmed that none of the conditions requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR occurred. Therefore, the previously prepared SEIR and Addendum to the SEIR, taken together, are determined to be adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for this project and satisfy all the requirements of CEQA. The SEIR for the Housing Element update included a Statement of Overriding Considerations for two significant and unavoidable impacts: development facilitated by the General Plan Amendment and rezonings could potentially add traffic to the regional roadway network to the point at which they would operate unacceptably under Cumulative Plus Project conditions; and development facilitated by the General Plan Amendment and rezonings has the potential to adversely change the significance of historic resources (staff notes that the subject site was not one of the housing sites that contained older structures that may be historic). The Council needs to reaffirm the earlier overriding considerations for this project. CONCLUSION Staff analysis concludes that the project is consistent with the Housing Site Development Standards and Design Guidelines with the acceptable exceptions referred to in this report and is consistent with City policies for creating higher-density housing near transportation corridors and hubs. Staff finds the site layout to be acceptable and Page 10 of 11