15 ATTACHMENT 5 AND 6 - Laserfiche WebLink

DRAFT everyone agrees to having a driveway there, who is going to pay for the driveway, and this question was not resolved in advance of this meeting. He noted, however, that he is happy to report that right before the meeting, both parties had indicated to him that they had come to some kind of financial agreement and that he will have to ask them to expand on it. He indicated that he still believes that the condition, as written, will work because it does not really address the financial aspect but just talks about the responsibility of the developer to do it. He stated that his understanding of the agreement is that the developers have actually stepped forward and said they will do it, and a portion of the cost would be reimbursed by ValleyCare. He added that he is hoping to get some confirmation from both parties tonight that they have resolved this issue. Mr. Dolan stated that the second point, and the reason why ValleyCare really has any standing to request this, is there are mutual access easements across each of these properties. He indicated that there is some arrangement for parking which has been worked out previously, but both parties have rights to access through the other's property; however, when this project is built, the access changes for ValleyCare. He added that ValleyCare believes some of the project traffic will go out behind its building onto Stoneridge Drive, and there is an area there where ValleyCare has some sort of recycling and other functions and it will have to adjust that to make sure they are not interfering with St. Anton traffic going out that aisle. He indicated that ValleyCare is requesting that staff add a condition suggesting that St. Anton work with ValleyCare to make that back driveway work. He noted that it is a cooperative kind of condition which is not onerous on either party and all subject to staff's approval. Commissioner Pearce inquired if there is a representative from ValleyCare in the audience. Mr. Dolan replied that there are two representatives present. Chair Blank stated that Condition No. 12 seems pretty onerous and inquired if this is something the applicant has agreed to or just something staff is proposing. Ms. Rondash replied that this is a standard condition for residential type of developments. Commissioner Posson asked staff to point out on the site map where the new driveway would be located. Ms. Rondash displayed the site map on the screen and pointed out that it would be located where there is currently a bus stop, which would need to be relocated. Commissioner Posson inquired if it would be on the Stoneridge Drive side of the bus stop. Ms. Rondash said yes. DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 5/8/13 Page 2 of 9