My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 5 AND 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
052113
>
15 ATTACHMENT 5 AND 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2015 2:36:41 PM
Creation date
5/15/2013 4:22:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/21/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENTS 5 AND 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AI I Ael -MINI 5 <br />DRAFT <br />PUD- 81- 30 -87D, St. Anton Partners, Inc. — Anton Hacienda Apartments <br />Application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Development Plan approval to <br />construct 168 apartment units and related site improvements at 5729 West Las <br />Positas Boulevard. Zoning for the property is Planned Unit Development — High <br />Density Residential (PUD -HDR) District. <br />Commissioner Narum recused herself and left the dais. <br />Rosalind Rondash presented the staff report and described the background, scope, and <br />key elements of the proposal. She then noted that staff has given the Commission a <br />memo which includes updates on the Housing Commission's recommendation <br />regarding affordable housing, as well as some additional conditions of approval that are <br />potentially going to be incorporated into the project and for which staff would like the <br />Commission to provide its input. <br />Chair Blank requested Ms. Rondash to summarize the memo for the public, who have <br />not had a chance to read it. <br />Ms. Rondash stated that at its May 2, 2013 meeting, the Housing Comrnission <br />discussed the affordable housing elements that could be incorporated into the project <br />and outlined its recommendation of a total of 35 rent - restricted, affordable units at <br />50 percent Area Median Income (AMI) limits for a three - person household, which is <br />approximately $40,000, to be provided at this level of affordability. She added that the <br />Housing Commission also recommended a total of 16 affordable units that may be used <br />towards the inclusionary unit credits to facilitate other developments try ng to meet their <br />affordable housing. She noted that assuming the developers are successful in security <br />the partnership for the 16 units, the project would have a total of 42 affordable units: <br />35 units at 50- percent AMI and seven units at 100 - percent AMI. <br />Ms. Rondash continued that in that same memo, staff has also incorporated additional <br />conditions regarding an access issue that came up with the adjacent ValleyCare Health <br />System (VCHS) site. She added that VCHS representatives are still in communication <br />with the applicant and the City and that staff would like the Commission's input on those <br />are potential conditions. She noted that the memo also notes the addition of a few <br />words that were left out at the end of Condition No. 12. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he would like to add to Ms. Rondash discussion regarding the two <br />additional potential conditions in the staff memo. He indicated that with the construction <br />of this project, the access to ValleyCare is different and they do not really have access <br />off of West Las Positas Boulevard, which is the street on which it is addressed and their <br />front entrance faces. He noted that a number of different solutions were discussed, and <br />staff thought that the issue was resolved, but evidently it was not. He added that until <br />very recently, since the staff report was published, all the parties kind of agreed that the <br />solution would be to add another driveway; staff had some concerns about its distance <br />from the corner, but ultimately worked through those concerns and was satisfied that an <br />additional driveway will work. He indicated that what it really came down to was, if <br />DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 5/8/13 Page 1 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.