Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br /> program to connect to the City's recycled water system when it becomes available, <br /> for irrigation purposes. <br /> 3. Condition No. 88 — Principles of universal design. The introductory paragraph states <br /> that all the required adaptable dwelling units shall, at a minimum, provide.... They <br /> would like to delete the phrase "at a minimum" because they would like to identify all <br /> the things they would like to do and not know later that there is something else <br /> somebody came up with. Also for Conditions: <br /> a. Delete "visual" so it just says "audible doorbells". <br /> m. Front-mounted controls in all appliances. By limiting this to front-mounted <br /> controls on all appliances, it substantially limits the kinds of appliances that <br /> are available to us in those units. As an example, gas appliances tend to be <br /> predominantly front knobbed and electric back knobbed, and They would like <br /> to have a little more choice for what they were putting in the units. <br /> o. Single-lever water controls at all plumbing fixtures and closets; their architect <br /> stated that dual-lever actually meets universal design. They would like to <br /> have some flexibility here and put it where it is needed or desired but not <br /> necessarily in all units. For example, we'd put it on those where it was <br /> needed or desired in some way. "Hand held adjustable shower heads" would <br /> be the same thing. <br /> Mr. lnderbitzen then stated that Condition No. 93 on the Pleasanton Unified School <br /> District (PUSD) exceeds the legal authority of the City to encourage them to work with <br /> PUSD to meet their mitigation requirement which will likely be in excess of the statutory <br /> maximum allowed by law. He indicated that they understand this and are in the process <br /> of doing it. He added that they expect to have an agreement with PUSD before the <br /> project goes to the City Council regarding what those fees would be, and they would like <br /> to substitute that agreement for this condition. <br /> Development Agreement: <br /> 1. Section 3.05.School Fees —this is the same as the PUSD condition of approval. <br /> They would expect that to be modified by the time the project gets to the City <br /> Council. <br /> 2. Section 3.03.Traffic Mitigation Measures: Traffic Impact Fees —This project is in the <br /> North Pleasanton Improvement District (NPID), and reference is made to paying a <br /> non-NPID fee. They would like the ability to do an accounting exercise and verify <br /> what that fee is and how much has to go back if, in any, because this property has <br /> changed ownership a couple of times since that credit got accounted for. <br /> Chair Blank stated that he may have misunderstood the clarification regarding the <br /> universal design and asked Mr. Inderbitzen if what he mentioned was that they were <br /> fine with a visual doorbell unit but not with an audible one. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 3/27/2013 Page 8 of 22 <br />