My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
041613
>
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 3:03:53 PM
Creation date
4/10/2013 3:42:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 1,4,6,9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> Commissioner Narum corrected that it is the other way around; they want the audible <br /> and not the visual. <br /> Mr. Inderbitzen replied that was correct. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that staff has had some dialogue on all of these conditions and that he <br /> would be happy to continue that dialogue with the applicant. He suggested that, if the <br /> Commission wishes, the phrase "or as otherwise approved by the Director of <br /> Community Development' could be added to the conditions, as written, and the <br /> Commission would not need to go through the details of the conditions. <br /> Mr. lnderbitzen indicated this would be fine and that they could work it out between now <br /> and when it goes before the City Council. <br /> Commissioner Pearce thanked Mr. Dolan and asked if he is suggesting this simply for <br /> Condition No. 88 or for Conditions Nos. 55 and 40 as well. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that it would be for all the conditions. <br /> Commissioner Pearce inquired if that would also include the PUSD condition. <br /> Mr. Dolan noted that Mr. lnderbitzen made a specific suggestion that this condition be <br /> ultimately replaced by the agreement and that staff does not oppose that as part of the <br /> Commission's recommendation. He added that if the applicant has an agreement with <br /> PUSD, the condition would be moot. <br /> Chair Blank stated that he assumes if there is no agreement, legal staff will figure out <br /> whether or not that condition should be there, considering that it cannot be there illegally <br /> as Mr. lnderbitzen is suggesting. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that is correct. <br /> Commissioner Posson noted that Condition No. 60 talks about allowing the future <br /> installation of photovoltaic (PV) and solar water heating systems, adding that the <br /> apartment buildings are going to be wired in order to meet Title 24 requirements. He <br /> inquired why the solar panels not be installed now. <br /> Todd Regonini, Sares Regis Group, Project Manager for this development community, <br /> stated that the project will have to comply with the Green Points checklist, and an initial <br /> run-through with that checklist shows that the project is approaching 100 points, far in <br /> excess of the minimum that is required; therefore, there is no actual need to put the <br /> PV's in right now from the standpoint of sustainability standards. He added that they <br /> would be happy to look at this later on if it makes sense from an operational standpoint. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 3/27/2013 Page 9 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.