18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9 - Laserfiche WebLink

As a result of Ordinance 1596, tracking of the 9,889,000 developable square feet in Hacienda needs to be done in two separate groups of properties: 1) the non-MOIPD and non-MCOIPD properties (commonly called pre-1993 properties) and; 2) the MOIPD and MCOIPD properties (commonly called post-1993 properties). The CA Center property is a pre-1993 property. The breakdown of the square footage allocated to each group is shown in the table below: Total Square Feet Allowed Pre-1993 5,257,941 Post-1993 4,631,059 Total 9,889,000 Roughly 552,000 square feet remains unassigned in Hacienda Business Park broken down for the two groups of properties as follows: Total Square Total Built or Total Remaining Feet Allowed Approved Square Feet Square Feet Pre-1993 5,257,941 4,864,392 393,549 Post-1993 4,631,059 4,472,4831 158,576 Total 9,889,000 9,336,875 552,125 For post-1993 properties,commercial uses are converted into office-equivalent square foctage based on the PM peak hour traffic trips generated. The 552,000 square feet of unassigned capacity may change based on a few unresolved items: whether all residential uses are exempt from the cap and how and where to allocate excess capacity. There is language in Ordinance 1596 that indicates that all residential areas should be excluded from the calculation of the 9,889,000 square feet. However, it is unclear if the language relates to the existing and proposed residential projects in 1993 or if it also includes any future residential development in Hacienda. The issue of how to best treat the residential development against the cap needs to be resolved. Determinations are also needed on how and where the remaining square footage should be assigned (e.g., Should it remain first-come first- served with respect to its allocation? Should square footage in the pre-1993 area stay in the pre- 1993 properties or could it move to post-1993 properties as long as the overall 9,889,000 square foot cap is maintained?). Staff is planning to bring these questions to Council this year to obtain direction. In the meantime, staff believes it is acceptable to approve this project without these determinations made given that the City needed to allow residential on this site in order to meet its RHNA and, even if the City Council decides to count this project's 305 residential units towards the cap, it would still fit under the pre-1993 cap as shown in the table on the following page. PUD-85-08-1 D-4M Page - 26- March 27, 2013