My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
041613
>
18 ATTACHMENT 1-4; 6-9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2015 3:03:53 PM
Creation date
4/10/2013 3:42:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 1,4,6,9
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
project given its location next to more contemporary styled office and retail buildings, which <br /> staff believes would have made the apartment buildings appear out of place. Staff believes that <br /> the proposed buildings contain an appropriate mix of residential and office characteristics given <br /> the surrounding building designs and that the buildings would complement, and be compatible <br /> with, the overall design character (and "look") of Pleasanton. The Windstar and BRE apartment <br /> projects are examples of approved but not constructed projects that similarly have incorporated a <br /> mix of residential and office characteristics given their surroundings. <br /> Staff is recommending that the applicant make a few minor revisions and/or provide additional <br /> details to address the following items: <br /> Apartment Buildings <br /> • Make the individual unit entries on the ground floor more prominent. <br /> • Ensure the windows are "punched" in from the exterior building wall or defined by <br /> well-designed trims per the Standards. <br /> • Ensure the reveals for the stucco and smooth cementitious panels are substantial <br /> enough to be discernible. <br /> Retail Buildings <br /> • Provide details of the planter areas, planter pots, enhanced paving, etc along the <br /> storefronts. <br /> Conditions of approval have been included to address these items. <br /> The proposed building colors are the same as shown at the work session except the applicant <br /> revised the retail building colors to match the colors used on the community/leasing office <br /> buildings. At the work session, some Commissioners indicated a potential concern with the <br /> mustard yellow color depending on how bold/bright it was. The Commission requested that <br /> large color chips be provided when the project returned for its formal review. The applicant has <br /> provided 81/2 inch by 11 inch samples of the colors (which will be available for viewing at the <br /> Planning Commission hearing). Staff finds the proposed colors, including the mustard yellow <br /> color, to be acceptable. <br /> Office Parking Structure <br /> Although no plans for the office parking garage were provided at the work session, the <br /> Commission was informed that a four-level garage would be proposed by the applicant. The <br /> applicant has since determined that additional parking spaces are desired for the office tenants <br /> and additional parking was added to the parking structure, resulting in a five-level structure. <br /> The parking structure would feature concrete walls, rails, and columns. As some locations, steel <br /> cable rails would be used in lieu of concrete rails. Louvered glass stairway towers and concrete <br /> and glass elevator towers would be located at the northwest and northeast corners. These towers <br /> would serve as both the visual and pedestrian focal points of the structure. A horizontal metal <br /> PUD-85-08-1 D-4M Page - 19 - March 27, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.