Laserfiche WebLink
recommend this option due to its failure to meet the IZO's requirement that 15% of all <br /> units be affordable to very low and low income households. Regarding Option 2, the <br /> Housing Commission's concerns were related to the lack of affordability resulting from <br /> the fact that twenty-three of the forty-six units are reserved for moderate income, not <br /> very low and low as set forth in the IZO. <br /> As the Council concerns about the legal standing of the City's IZO was anticipated in <br /> the Housing Element, it includes a policy (Policy 16.2) that indicates the City's intent to <br /> amend the IZO to ensure consistency with the Housing Element's goals and "recent <br /> court decisions regarding rental housing." This item is addressed more fully in a <br /> separate agenda report on this evening's agenda and provides the City Council with <br /> options for addressing the Housing Commission's concern regarding this inconsistency. <br /> Notwithstanding these broader affordable housing policy issues, staff has indicated that <br /> in view of the current legal environment, both Option 1 and Option 2 would adequately <br /> address the intent of the IZO which is to secure rent restricted units for the life of a <br /> development. Overall, Option 2 provides a greater number of units and, therefore, it is <br /> staffs recommendation and, while Option 1 provides deeper affordability that cannot be <br /> minimized, staff is concerned that this will result in future affordable housing proposals <br /> that are less than 15% without deep affordability. Notwithstanding this concern, staff <br /> would support the selection of Option 1 and, if approved, staff would amend the <br /> attached recommended affordable housing agreement to reflect this option. <br /> Apart from the differences related to levels of affordability, the recommended affordable <br /> housing agreement would have the following terms for either Option 1 or Option 2: <br /> • The agreement will be recorded with the land and remain affordable for perpetuity. <br /> • Requires the development to accept Section 8 housing vouchers from eligible <br /> qualified applicants. <br /> • Affordable units will be rented based on the City's adopted preference system. <br /> • Payment of the City's Lower Income Housing Fee is not required as the <br /> development will meet the goals of the City IZO and Resolution 10-390. <br /> • Affordable units would have finishes similar to market units and would be located <br /> throughout the development. <br /> • Rents would be based on current Area Median Income levels. <br /> • One of the Affordable 1-bedroom units, one of the Affordable 2-bedroom units and <br /> one of the Affordable 3-bedroom units shall be fully accessible for the physically <br /> disabled. Unit design shall include amenities such as grab bars, modified case work <br /> and bathroom facilities, and other amenities deemed significant for disabled access. <br /> Further details regarding the background of this matter are included in the Housing <br /> Commission agenda reports included as Exhibit D of Attachment 9. The recommended <br /> Affordable Housing Agreement is included as Attachment 2. <br /> Development Agreement <br /> The applicants have proposed a development agreement (Attachment 3) to vest the <br /> entitlements for the project. The term of the development agreement would expire in 10 <br /> Page 8 of 12 <br />