My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN031913
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
CCMIN031913
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2013 2:23:31 PM
Creation date
4/9/2013 2:23:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/19/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
revenue projections for the fiscal year totaled $89.7 million, balanced by $89.7 million in expenditures. <br /> At mid-term, staff is projecting an increase of almost $1.6 million in both revenues and expenditures for <br /> a total budget of $91.3 million. Additional revenue sources include an increase in 'Development Service <br /> Fees Hotel/Motel Tax revenues, Business License Fees, Recreation Fees, Document Transfer Tax <br /> revenues, franchise fees and $250,000 from a settlement with Caltrans, all of which is offset by <br /> decreased Sales Tax revenue projections amounting to nearly $500,000. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio asked what might explain a decrease in Sales Tax revenues when other <br /> revenues sources are on the rise. Ms. Wagner explained that it is largely due to the Vanstar settlement <br /> payments, which total nearly $450,000 for the fiscal year, as well as the permanent diversion of a good <br /> portion of "business to business" tax revenues to the County wide pool. Over the last 3-4 years, <br /> Pleasanton has lost nearly $2 million in Sales Tax revenues to the county pool and received only <br /> $160,000 back. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio asked and Ms. Wagner confirmed that it is not necessarily an indicator that <br /> people are not shopping in Pleasanton. <br /> Ms. Wagner reviewed adjusted expenditures, which include 646,000 previously approved by the <br /> Council for the East Pleasanton Specific Plan, increased non-personnel costs offset by a decrease in <br /> personnel costs, PG&E costs for building and streetlights, outside attorney fees for litigation, additional <br /> human resource costs, and an update to the Economic Development Strategic Plan that is already <br /> underway. The net result is an increase in available resources of $722,000 which staff is <br /> recommending be placed into contingency funds until year end. <br /> She presented a comparison of personnel and non-personnel expenditures, noting the fiscal policy <br /> adopted by the Council to reduce personnel costs to no more than 70% of the total operating budget. <br /> Over the 13 year history shown, personnel costs have ranged from a low of 63% to a high of almost <br /> 80% in 2010. Staff is projecting personnel costs to total 76% of the current operating budget. Current <br /> efforts to reduce personnel costs include the evaluation of every position as employees retire or are <br /> terminated, the two tier pension and retiring medical benefit program adopted in 2012, and ongoing <br /> negotiation of expiring labor agreements to include employee payment of the Employer Paid Member <br /> Contribution. Staff is currently negotiating with PCEA to have its members to pick up the remaining 4% <br /> of the EPMC, with the goal being that employees pay the full 8% EPMC by July 1, 2013. <br /> General Fund Reserves started the year at $25.3 million and are recommended to end at the same, <br /> with a slight adjustment in allocation to increase the 10% Reserve for Economic Uncertainties relative <br /> to increased revenues. <br /> Ms. Wagner reviewed the Water Maintenance and Operations Fund which is projected to end the year <br /> at $6.4 million, $400,000 higher than originally anticipated. Revenue increases include federal and state <br /> funding for the recycled water program and Castlewood Service Area fees. Expenditures include an <br /> offset to the Castlewood Service Area fees, increased personnel costs resulting from retiring medical <br /> contributions, increased non-personnel costs for the recycled water program and increased Zone 7 <br /> service rates. She noted that the City continues to pass through all Zone 7 increases to the ratepayer <br /> but explained that revenues were initially overestimated and expenditures underestimated. Revenues <br /> from the recycled water surcharge are also being transferred from the operating fund down to the Water <br /> Repair and Replacement Fund to support capital improvements rather than operations. <br /> The Sewer Fund is looking at a $400,000 decrease in the projected ending balance, primarily due to a <br /> miscalculation of revenues and expenditures for the DSRSD pass through rates. Staff is proposing to <br /> increase revenues for the Castlewood Service Area contract but this is offset by increased personnel <br /> costs. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 3 of 13 March 19, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.