My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
031913
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2013 5:15:34 PM
Creation date
3/12/2013 5:15:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/19/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Loll and Ms. Grose informed Commissioner Wedge that receiving <br /> compensation from any of the agencies applying for grant funding would require <br /> Commissioners disqualify themselves from the grant review process. <br /> Ms. Crose provided information regarding funding amounts requested by agencies and the <br /> funding amounts committed. She discussed confusion that had been experienced by agencies <br /> and the Commission. Commissioner De Baca Martens suggested that staff explain this to the <br /> agencies before they present to the Commission for funding. <br /> Ms. Yurchak advised that agencies have been asked to provide informal:ion regarding the <br /> effects on the project for which they are requesting funding if the funding request is not <br /> allocated. She also noted that agencies are required to submit requested documents, unless <br /> they have done so previously. Commission Loll questioned whether the members of the <br /> Commission would be able to access the documents for agencies that had applied previously <br /> for funding. <br /> Ms. Grose felt it would be beneficial to staff if Commissioners would make notes in the Note <br /> Section if they would like an agency to present at the March meeting. Commissioner Loll <br /> suggested this be done in the scoring comment section. Ms. Crose suggested Commissioners <br /> also email her with their recommendations for agencies they would like to present. <br /> Commissioners discussed how to evaluate and select the agencies to present and discussed <br /> questions that should be asked. <br /> Commissioner De Baca Martens had questions about allocating full funding amounts <br /> requested by the agencies and Chairperson McLane and Ms. Crose discussed the possibility <br /> that the Commission may not want to recommend full funding. Chairperson McLane also <br /> noted that any funds not allocated would roll over into the next funding cycle. <br /> Commissioner Massie discussed her employment with the Livermore opera making her <br /> ineligible to participate in the grant funding process. <br /> Commissioner De Baca Martens suggested changing report wording from "Commissioner's <br /> Recommendations" to "Staffs Recommendations" on the report provided to the Commission at <br /> the March meeting. She also suggested "Commissioner's Average Recommendations" be <br /> considered. <br /> Commissioner Loll questioned whether it would be possible to view the funding amount <br /> recommendations made by individual Commissioners, rather than the average of <br /> recommended allocations. Ms. Crose advised that the Commission would be provided <br /> additional information this year because changes have been made to the report. <br /> 6. Approve Commission Priorities for Fiscal Years 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 <br /> Ms. Grose informed the Commission that biannually City Council holds a Priority Setting <br /> Workshop where they discuss citywide initiatives and projects for implementation by the <br /> different departments during the two-year budget cycle. To prepare for this Workshop, City <br /> Civic Arts Commission <br /> February 4, 2013 <br /> Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.