Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Thorne said he too has heard a lot of interest and comments relating to the cemetery. <br /> He asked staff to describe the process that would allow the City to increase funding for that project. Mr. <br /> Fialho said that as part of adopting the next CIP, the Council, staff and public would have an <br /> opportunity to advance whatever projects they would like for consideration. <br /> Councilmember Thorne also noted that he had been working for a little under one year with leaders of <br /> the City's various sports leagues to try and identify funding mechanisms for the sports fields at Bernal <br /> Park, that City staff is now involved in the process and they are very close to reaching an agreement. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Hosterman/Cook-Kallio to waived full reading and Resolution No. 12-551 <br /> approving the Capital Improvement Program. Motion carried by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, McGovern, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: Councilmember Sullivan <br /> 22. Authorize Execution of an Agreement with the Alameda County Regional Emergency <br /> Communications Center not to exceed $189,089 Annually for Emergency Dispatch Services for <br /> the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department <br /> Fire Chief Miguel introduced Battalion Chief Joe Testa, Project Manager for Alameda County Regional <br /> Emergency Communications Center (ACRECC), and Deputy Chief Dave Rocha of the Alameda County <br /> Fire Department. He recognized the exceptional emergency dispatch services provided by the City of <br /> Livermore Police Department over the last sixteen years. <br /> He explained that while ACRECC dispatches both fire and ambulance services for all surrounding <br /> agencies, Pleasanton's 911 calls are received by the Pleasanton Police Department before being <br /> transferred to the City of Livermore for fire dispatch and then ACRECC for ambulance dispatch. <br /> Another issue is that ten of the valley's eighteen fire units belong to the Livermore Pleasanton Fire <br /> Department, which has no direct radio communication with neighboring units. This creates challenges <br /> in terms of efficiency, mutual aid, and duplication of service. <br /> In addition to bringing dispatch services under one regional operation, the agreement with ACRECC will <br /> allow the City to participate in its Automatic Vehicle Locator program. This allows the closest engine or <br /> paramedic service to respond to emergency calls, potentially reducing response time and redundant <br /> service even further. The agreement would also allow the department to provide emergency medical <br /> priority dispatching service, which results in a $43,000 reimbursement per advanced life support unit to <br /> be paid by the Alameda County Emergency Services Agency. <br /> Battalion Chief Testa provided a brief history on the service growth of the Livermore Pleasanton Fire <br /> Department since it was formed sixteen years before. He concurred that the proposed agreement <br /> represents some significant benefits to the community in terms of seamless response. He assured the <br /> Council that ACRECC is a secure operation that is backed by true experts in both fire and police <br /> dispatch and exceeds the standards set for emergency fire and dispatch centers in every area. <br /> ACRECC also provides several advanced technologies the City does not currently have access to <br /> which include move-up and personnel recall systems. <br /> Mayor Hosterman asked how this relates to the East Bay Regional Communications System (EBRCS). <br /> Mr. Testa stated that both the Pleasanton and Livermore Police Departments remain on track to join <br /> EBRCS in July or August. Alameda County has plans to do so at the beginning of 2013. <br /> Mr. Miguel discussed the fiscal impacts, which are essentially negligible. FY 2011.12 dispatch costs are <br /> anticipated at approximately $157,000 while proposed dispatch costs for FY 2012-12 with ACRECC are <br /> just over $164,000. He noted that the proposed contracts secure service for five years, with a maximum <br /> City Council Minutes Page 7 of 10 June 19, 2012 <br />