Laserfiche WebLink
projected cost of $189,000 in FY 2016-17, and estimated the overall cost to be on par with the current <br /> service. He added that ACRECC would absorb the full conversion costs of joining its station alert <br /> system, which will save the department just over $200,000 in currently budgeted funds. He asked the <br /> Council to authorize the City Manager to execute the contract, once full and complete, with ACRECC. <br /> Councilmember McGovern asked and Mr. Miguel confirmed that the City of Livermore would be <br /> transferring fire and ambulance dispatch services to ACRECC as well. <br /> Councilmember McGovern requested clarification on voting rights within the JPA. Mr. Miguel explained <br /> that a number of agencies are looking into ACRECC at the moment. Voting rights are not yet specified <br /> because the number of voting members is expected to change. <br /> Mayor Hosterman opened the item for public comment. <br /> Karla Brown asked if the transition is expected to inhibit communication in any way. <br /> Mr. Miguel said "no," the redundancies should in fact improve, especially following the move to EBRCS. <br /> Mayor Hosterman closed public comment. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by McGovern/Cook-Kallio to authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement <br /> with the Alameda County Regional Communications Center not to exceed $189,089 annually for <br /> emergency dispatch services for the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department. Motion carried by the <br /> following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Cook-Kallio, McGovern, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: Councilmember Sullivan <br /> Item Removed from the Consent Calendar <br /> 2. Adopt a resolution calling the November 6, 2012 General Municipal Election; a resolution <br /> requesting consolidation with the Statewide General Election; and a resolution amending the <br /> regulations for candidate statements to include additional required languages <br /> Mr. Fialho summarized Councilmember McGovern's concern as relating to the third requested action. <br /> He directed the Council's attention to page 2 of the staff report, which describes an estimated cost of <br /> $1,117 for the printing of candidate statements, sample ballot and voter information pamphlet. The <br /> estimate is computed based on approximately 40,200 registered Pleasanton voters, roughly 40,000 of <br /> whom receive ballot information in English. 271 and 42 registered voters receive their information in <br /> Chinese and Spanish, respectively. He noted that candidate statements are optional and therefore, as <br /> is consistent with the 2010 election, staff is proposing that the full cost be passed on to prospective <br /> candidates. He also noted that following the election the City Clerk may either bill or reimburse <br /> candidates for any increase or decrease in expenses once the County Registrar provides specific data <br /> on the amount of materials required. <br /> Based on the 2010 figure, the county estimates the cost of candidate outreach to Pleasanton voters to <br /> be less than three cents per registered voter. In addition, candidates are required to pay a $25 filing fee <br /> as is consistent with State law. Historically, the Council has elected to pass various levels of subsidy on <br /> to candidates but the Council's policy of late has been to achieve full cost recovery wherever possible. <br /> The current proposal is consistent with the 2010 election, but it is the Council's prerogative to proceed <br /> differently. <br /> Mayor Hosterman asked where previous subsidy funds have come from. Mr. Fialho said the General <br /> Fund Contingency. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 10 June 19, 2012 <br />