Laserfiche WebLink
revenues from future growth in Pleasanton, as appropriate. The primary revenue impacts <br /> are likely to be property and sales taxes, while business taxes and hotel and motel taxes <br /> will also likely be significant. EPS will develop a detailed forecasting methodology for <br /> each revenue item based on land use, density, and location criteria of new growth. The <br /> forecast will consider historic trends and will reflect a set of city-specific assumptions. <br /> For example, property tax from new residential uses will be based on property values by <br /> development prototype and location. While lower density residential homes are more <br /> valuable on a per-unit basis, higher density residential, particularly along the City's <br /> transit corridors, may be more valuable on a per-land acre basis, increasing property tax <br /> proceeds to the City. <br /> Subtask 3.3: Net Fiscal Balance <br /> The net fiscal impact will be based on a comparison of total costs and revenues in <br /> constant dollars. EPS will estimate this amount, provide summary tables and graphics, <br /> and document the key assumptions and calculations. The magnitude of this net fiscal <br /> balance will be one determinant of fiscal performance and will contribute to further policy <br /> formation related to balancing and incentivizing specific types of growth in the City. As <br /> part of this task, EPS will identify fiscal mitigation measures that would ensure the City's <br /> long-term financial sustainability upon buildout. <br /> The fiscal results (annual surpluses or deficits) are simply indicators of fiscal <br /> performance; they do not mean that the City will automatically have surplus revenues or <br /> deficits because the City must have a balanced budget each year. Persistent shortfalls <br /> shown in a fiscal analysis may indicate the need to reduce service levels or obtain <br /> additional revenues; persistent surpluses will provide the City with resources to reduce <br /> liabilities such as deferred maintenance, improve service levels, or build up reserves. As <br /> part of this task, EPS will include a qualitative discussion on how fiscal benefits may <br /> affect different stakeholders and how these impacts could change over time. <br /> Subtask 3.4: Revenue and Expenditure Growth Trends <br /> This task will determine the magnitude of potential revenue or cost escalation impacts on <br /> the net fiscal balance at buildout. Given that the fiscal impact analysis will be conducted <br /> for the City in the future, various revenue and cost escalation factors may have <br /> significant implications on the analytical findings due to various rates of growth. <br /> Specifically, the fiscal impact analysis will distinguish between various revenue growth <br /> rates, cost escalations, and inflation. EPS will review historic growth trends for key <br /> revenues and costs and will seek input from City staff about future growth rates for <br /> projection purposes. For example, employee benefit costs have been recently escalating <br /> at above normal rates given the State's reduction in forecasted Public Employee <br /> Retirement System (PERS) investment returns. This could have an impact on cost <br /> growth among all major expenditures going forward given that employee costs comprise <br /> nearly 80 percent of the General Fund budget. <br /> Upon completion of the revenue and expenditure growth forecast, EPS will test the <br /> sensitivity of various escalation rates among different revenues and costs to bracket a <br /> range of potential outcomes relative to the analytical findings of the fiscal impact <br /> 3 U:Flscal Impact Report\Exhfbit A to Contract floc <br />