Laserfiche WebLink
Task 3 : Fiscal Impact Analysis <br /> The fiscal impact analysis will quantify the effects of new growth in Pleasanton based on <br /> operating revenues and expenditures at buildout. EPS will develop a comprehensive <br /> fiscal impact model to be used as a policy tool for assessment of fiscal performance of <br /> new growth. While the analysis will focus on the City of Pleasanton's General Fund <br /> budget, other major funds will be considered. The analysis will be designed to distinguish <br /> between land use, location, and density of new growth to quantify fiscal performance <br /> within these categories. The categories will be based on the recently adopted General <br /> Plan designations (i.e., low-density residential, medium-density residential, high-density <br /> residential, mixed-use residential and commercial, business park, etc.) For example, <br /> high-density residential, characterized by compact infill development near transit, is likely <br /> to result in lower service cost relative to low-density residential along the City's fringe. <br /> It is understood that the City uses a biennial budget starting in odd numbered years. <br /> EPS will base its analysis on the adopted FY2011-12 budget. Additionally, EPS will <br /> evaluate the City's historic budgetary performance to make sure that FY2011-12 budget <br /> adequately reflects long-term historic trends. To the extent the current budget has <br /> abnormal revenues or costs, EPS will utilize specific items based on historic patterns and <br /> input from City staff, as necessary. EPS will utilize forecasting approaches to each major <br /> line item that best fits the unique structure and budgetary trend. Key service and <br /> revenue forecasting methodologies are described below. <br /> Subtask 3.1: Public Service Cost Forecasts <br /> EPS will develop a description of the demand for key public services associated with new <br /> growth based on review of the City budget and discussion with City staff. Public service <br /> areas to be covered will include public safety (e.g., police and fire); parks and community <br /> services (parks and recreation); traffic and road services; general government, planning <br /> and development services; and public works. Budget elements with minimal impacts, <br /> minimal costs, or high levels of fee-based cost recovery will be documented. <br /> Public service costs will be evaluated based on the public service needs driven by new <br /> population and employment growth. As part of this task, EPS will conduct in-person <br /> interviews with the City's key departments, including police, fire, public works, and parks <br /> and community services. Cost estimates for other services will be developed based on <br /> information obtained from the existing City budget and recent EPS fiscal analyses in <br /> Pleasanton and other comparable jurisdictions, and additional research. Given that <br /> different costs have various demand structures and trends, EPS will utilize a range of <br /> approaches, as necessary. In some cases, marginal cost approach will be utilized, <br /> reflecting unique relationships between each service provision and demand from new <br /> growth, and any current excess or deficient capacity. In other cases, estimates of <br /> demand for services will be based on "per-employee" or"per-resident equivalents" as <br /> appropriate. <br /> Subtask 3.2: Revenue Forecasts <br /> EPS will evaluate the effects of new population and employment growth in Pleasanton on <br /> key City revenue categories. A range of approaches will be utilized to forecast new <br /> 2 II:IFISCe:Impact Report\ExhiNt F to Conf2R.00c <br />