Laserfiche WebLink
BACKGROUND <br /> Project Description <br /> Staff reviewed City Funding sources that could be used to fund the Stanley Boulevard <br /> UUD, Rule 20B and was not able to identify the required funding. During the funding <br /> review, Rule 20A funding was identified that could be used toward undergrounding the <br /> overhead utilities. In order to be eligible for Rule 20A funding, PG&E requires the City <br /> to establish the UUD. The formation process includes a public hearing and a formal <br /> resolution to underground the overhead utilities, specifying the exact limits of the District <br /> and stating the public necessity of the conversion. <br /> Underground Utility District (UUD) Rule 20A Funds <br /> For a number of years the City has had an active utility conversion program to <br /> underground overhead utilities on major streets. Moving overhead utility lines <br /> underground improves aesthetics, increases property values, provides more reliable <br /> utility service and eliminates unsightly tree trimming for overhead wires. <br /> For the last 25 years, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has required <br /> PG&E and Pacific Bell (AT&T) to set aside an annual conversion allocation, which is <br /> apportioned to cities and counties in their service areas based upon the number of <br /> electrical meters for overhead electrical services within the City's boundaries. These <br /> funds are commonly referred to as Rule 20A funds. Currently the City has accumulated <br /> $1M in credits and receives a yearly allocation credit of approximately $150,000. With <br /> the current balance and expected revenue over the next four years, combined with a <br /> program that allows the borrowing of future credits after a funding threshold is met, the <br /> City meets PG&E's criteria for the project to be entered into PG&E's queue for design <br /> and construction scheduling. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The Stanley Boulevard project was originally planned as a street surface improvement <br /> project including curb, gutter, sidewalks, lighting and landscaping in accordance with the <br /> 2002 Downtown Specific Plan. The project was estimated to cost $2.5 million. The <br /> funding to construct the street improvement project is currently available in the CIP, of <br /> which approximately half is restricted for use on the street improvements only. <br /> The utility undergrounding work that was added to the project in 2008 is estimated to <br /> cost $3.25 million. This cost estimate is based upon a complete design for the work. <br /> When the undergrounding work was added to the project in 2008 it was planned that <br /> funding would be available in the CIP for construction. This project has been competing <br /> for limited CIP funding since the design was complete. Due to the number of worthy <br /> projects, coupled with the slowdown in the economy, no funding for this project has <br /> been identified. <br /> Staff is now recommending that Council consider Rule 20A funding for undergrounding <br /> the overhead utilities. In order to be eligible for Rule 20A, PG&E requires the City to <br /> establish the UUD. The formation process includes adopting a resolution initiating the <br /> formation of an underground utility district and setting a public hearing date. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />