My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 113011 Special Mtg
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 113011 Special Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
2/2/2012 11:27:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/30/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Olson, and Pentin <br />NOES: Commissioner Pearce <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />RECUSED: <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Resolutions Nos. PC-2011-43 approving the Case P11-0709 (Design Review) and <br />PC-2011-44 approving Case P11-0707 (Variances) were entered and approved as <br />motioned. <br /> <br />Chair Narum called for a brief break at 7:43 p.m., and thereafter, reconvened the <br />regular meeting at 7:53 p.m. <br /> <br />b. P11-0458, Ron Panich <br />Application for Design Review approval to demolish an existing duplex <br />structure located on the west side of the property located at 446 Sycamore <br />Road and to construct an approximately 2,739-square-foot addition to the <br />existing residence and related site improvements. Zoning for the property <br />is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development Low Density Residential) District. <br />(Note: The residence will be used as a congregate living health facility. <br />Such facilities are permitted by State Law, and the City has no land use <br />authority over them.) <br /> <br />This item was continued from the October 26, 2011 meeting. <br /> <br />Jenny Soo presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key elements <br />of the proposal. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman noted that at the last meeting the applicants stated their intent to have six <br />Category A beds and six Category C beds, and a resident raised a question about the <br />Health and Safety Code and whether or not a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) would be <br />required. She stated that the Citresearched this issue and while the <br />statute was unclear, she determined that any more than six beds under the B or <br />C Category would require a CUP. She added that the applicants considered whether a <br />12-bed facility under Category A would work for them and determined that it would. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman then went over the applicable Health and Safety Code sections regarding <br />Categories A, B, and C. She stated that Section 1250(i) allows congregate living health <br />facilities to have up to 12 beds and to serve three categories of persons: <br /> <br />1. Category A is for persons who are mentally alert, physically disabled, and who may <br />be ventilator-dependent. The current proposal is for 12 Category A beds. <br /> <br />2. Category B is for persons who have a diagnosis of terminal illness, life-threatening <br />illness, or both. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 30, 2011 Page 9 of 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.