My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 113011 Special Mtg
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 113011 Special Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
2/2/2012 11:27:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/30/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />3. Category C is for persons who are catastrophically and severely disabled. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman continued that Health and Safety Code Section 1267.8 states again and <br />again that congregate living health facilities shall be considered and treated as a <br />residential use; hence, they would need only what would be required of a single-family <br />residence and no Conditional Use Permits or Variances. She noted that in this case, <br />the application triggers only a Design Review approval. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman then stated that the section that came up at the last time regarding a split <br />of six beds in Category C and six beds in Category A is Health and Safety Code <br />Section 1267.16(c), which states that cities or counties where the applicant seeks to <br />place more than six beds of Category B or C beds in a facility can require a CUP. She <br />noted that this issue is now moot as the applicants will go with 12 beds under <br />Category A. She added that if the Commission wishes, staff can discuss either now or <br />at a later date how this may change in the future. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that he would like to hold this discussion. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman stated that should the Planning Commission approve this application for <br />12 Category A beds, and the applicants later change their mind and say they want to <br />have some other mix, State law says that if six or more Category C or Category B beds <br />go in, the applicants will need to return to the City for a CUP. She explained, however, <br />that if they want to change the make-up to something less than six Category B or C <br />beds, for example, eight Category A and 4 Category B or C, they would not need to <br />return for a CUP. She added that again, State law says the City must treat them as a <br />single-family residence, and Design Review is all that is triggered. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman stated that the Commission can add a condition stating that if the <br />applicant wants to put in six or more Category B or Category C beds in the future, they <br />must return for a CUP. She noted, however, that this is not necessary as there would <br />be a trigger to have this happen, but the Commission can add it to make things <br />absolutely clear. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if the requirement is for six or more or for more than six <br />Category B or Category C beds. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman replied that it is for six or more. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank requested confirmation that the applicant could then have seven <br />Category A beds and five Category B or Category C beds and will not have to return to <br />the Commission. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman said yes. She stated that she believed the reason behind the CUP <br />allowance by the State is that Category A persons who are mentally alert and higher <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 30, 2011 Page 10 of 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.