My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 113011 Special Mtg
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 113011 Special Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
2/2/2012 11:27:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/30/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />noted that it took a lot of time, and the Cunninghams have taken the time to make many <br />changes to the house. She indicated that she thinks they are moving in the right <br />direction but believes the house still does not meet Policy 17 of the Downtown Specific <br />Plan, which refers to perception and excessive lot coverage concerns, which she feels <br />are still present as demonstrated, however crudely, by the perceived FAR of the lower <br />lot. She stated that, given that she still has concerns about the massing, she would not <br />support the project. <br /> <br />Chair Narum stated that this is a tough one but appreciates the Cunninghams efforts in <br />meeting with Commissioner Pearce and herself and in coming up with some proposed <br />changes based on their comments, and then making further changes based on <br />comments made at a subsequent meeting. She noted that her comments three weeks <br />ago had to do with the appearance from the street and the relationship to the buildings, <br />and believes that with the changes now, she can support the project and make the <br />findings. She stated that if this project goes forward, she hopes for harmony in the <br />neighborhood at some point as well. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank agreed that this is always very tough, and people need to heal <br />when this is all over. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank moved to make the Variance findings listed in the <br />November 9, 2011 staff report and to approve Cases P11-0709 and P11-0707, <br />subject to the conditions of approval shown in Exhibit A of the November 9, 2011 <br />staff report, with the additional condition in the November 30, 2011 staff <br />memorandum. <br />Commissioner Pentin seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Chair Narum stated that she wanted to make it absolutely certain that with this approval, <br />there cannot be a lot split between the Hall house and this house at any future time. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that a lot split would require another variance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if that would automatically come back to the Commission. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan said yes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if it is not necessary then to include that in the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the Commission can make it very clear in its motion that the <br />; however, a subsequent <br />Commission could overrule that. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank amended his original motion to include that the <br />Commission strongly recommends that the lot never be split. <br />Commissioner Pentin accepted the amended motion. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 30, 2011 Page 8 of 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.