My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2012
>
020712
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2012 11:04:10 AM
Creation date
2/2/2012 11:04:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/7/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Eliminate the particular measure which the City incorrectly included in emission <br /> reductions from future fuel price increases. This was considered a little bit on the <br /> leading edge with about 19,000 metric tons applied to the CAP, possibly because <br /> the City did not really have to do anything to get that reduction. The District was <br /> more comfortable with not having that in the CAP and having strategies instead. <br /> 3. Strengthen Mitigation Measure TDM2-9, a transportation demand management <br /> program. Staff felt it was important to act on one of the specific <br /> recommendations made, which was fairly insignificant in terms of what it requires <br /> the City to do. <br /> 4. Change "incentivize" to "require" in all land use measures addressing <br /> development of codes related to density, infill, mixed-use, and transit-oriented <br /> development (TOD). One of the City's goals from the beginning was not to have <br /> a CAP that was filled with new regulations but to collaborate with the community <br /> and the business community. <br /> Mr. Smith then displayed two pie charts, the first showing the initial draft CAP <br /> projections with Commercial and Municipal and Residential Energy adding up to four <br /> percent, and Public Education and Engagement at 13 percent; and the second showing <br /> the final CAP where Public Education and Engagement had been eliminated with most <br /> of it going into Energy Efficiency and Generation and some into Land Use and <br /> Transportation. <br /> Mr. Smith then presented the CAP adjustments made as follows: <br /> • Municipal development codes (TDM2-9) were modified to require new <br /> non-residential projects over a certain size and configuration to implement at <br /> TDM program capable to reducing weekday peak-period vehicle trips by at least <br /> 20 percent. <br /> • Calculations of the City's Green Building Ordinance (EC1-2) were corrected to <br /> require new and significantly remodeled buildings to incorporate measures from <br /> Build It Green (BIG) green building guidelines. <br /> • Implement PG&E Partnership Program (EC2-2), a multi-year integrated resource <br /> strategy that incorporates PG&E's Core, Third Party, Local Government <br /> Partnership, Demand Response, Clean Air Transportation, Distributed <br /> Generation, and other pertinent programs. <br /> • Lead and participate in Solar Cities Program (ER2-2), a customer-assistance <br /> program designed to facilitate the purchase and installation of photovoltaics and <br /> other energy-efficient technologies for residential, commercial, and municipal <br /> facilities. <br /> Mr. Smith then displayed a chart demonstrating the GHG Reduction Potential in both <br /> the Draft and Final CAP. He also presented a summary of the Draft CAP Projections <br /> and the Final CAP Projections. He noted that the City will still meet the AB32 target <br /> with a buffer of 5,121 MT CO2e. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 1/11/2012 Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.