My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 12493
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
RES 12493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2012 3:16:41 PM
Creation date
1/13/2012 2:58:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/4/2012
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RES 12493
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.Written Comments on the Draft EIR and Responses to Comments <br /> Letter 5. E&S Ring Management Corporation <br /> (Ken Busch, Project Manager) <br /> 5-1 The comment notes an inconsistency between Table 3-3 which shows residential <br /> development on Site at 345-460 units and Table 5.1 which shows the project at 159 units. <br /> Table 5.1 reflects the correct number(159 residential units)which was the basis for the <br /> traffic analysis prepared by Fehr and Peers. Additionally, the Alternative 4 analyzed <br /> 212 residential units on Site 8,as shown in the updated land use assumptions used by <br /> Fehr and Peers. Therefore,Table 3-3 should be corrected to show the range of units for <br /> Site 8 as 159-345. <br /> The lb!lowing edit has been made to Table 3-3, row 8, on page 3-14 of the Draft SELR: <br /> TABLE 3-3 <br /> POTENTIAL SITES FOR REZONING <br /> No. <br /> Potential Units at No. <br /> Acreage for 23 Units at <br /> Existing General Plan MF units/a 30+ <br /> # Property APN Designation Acres Development c units/ac <br /> Retail/Highway/Service 345460 <br /> Auf de Maur/ Commercial, Business& <br /> 8 Richenback 9464542.045-03 Prof.Offices 16.0 11.5 159-345 <br /> 5-2 The comment requested clarification on the trip generation estimates used to determine <br /> project impacts related to Site 8, as the land uses outlined in the Draft SEIR do not reflect <br /> the proposed development correctly. The comment is correct that the transportation <br /> analysis did not use the same land use assumption that were described in the Draft <br /> Housing Element dated August, 2011. The land use assumptions for the site under the <br /> Draft SEIR reflect the best available information at the time of the analysis. Table 4-1 <br /> presents the land use summary available at the time of the transportation analysis. <br /> TABLE 4-1 <br /> LAND USE SUMMARY FOR SITE 8 <br /> Scenario Commercial Multi-Family Units <br /> No Project(Current Zoning) 210,000 sqft --- <br /> Housing Element Project(March 2011) 163,000 159 <br /> Alternatives 1-3 68,600 345 <br /> Alternative 4 163,000 212 <br /> Housing Element August 2011 40,000 345 <br /> SOURCE:Pleasanton Housing Element.Fehr and Peers.E&S Management Corporation,2011 <br /> General Plan Amendment and Rezonings 4-18 ESA/210016 <br /> Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report December 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.