Laserfiche WebLink
4.Written Comments on the Draft EIR and Responses to Comments <br /> Table 4-2 presents the trip generation estimated for each scenario(not accounting for <br /> discounts for internal trips or pass-by trips). As shown in Table 4-2, the zoning as <br /> described in the August 2011 Housing Element at Site 8 would generate substantially <br /> fewer daily and peak hour trips than the zoning scenario and the alternatives analyzed in <br /> the Draft SEIR. As such the development of Site 8 with 345 dwelling units, would not <br /> have resulted in worse intersection levels of service than were presented in the Draft <br /> SEIR, and would also result in a less than significant impact on local intersections under <br /> Existing plus Project conditions. <br /> TABLE 4-2 <br /> TRIP GENERATION COMPARISIONS FOR SITE 8 SCENARIOS <br /> Scenario Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour <br /> No Project(Current Zoning) 9,020 210 783 <br /> Housing Element Project(March 2011) 8,090 245 713 <br /> Alternatives 1-3 5,160 242 463 <br /> Alternative 4 8,410 271 742 <br /> Housing Element August 2011 3,930 213 356 <br /> SOURCE:Fehr and Peers,2011 <br /> 5-3 The comment requests an updated technical memorandum which clarifies the trip <br /> generation assumption for Site 8 based the proposed development of 345 residential units <br /> and 40,000 square feet of retail, which would not result in any new or increased <br /> transportation impact not analyzed in the Draft SEIR. The technical memorandum that <br /> clarifies the trip generation assumptions, as outlined in response to comment 5-2, is <br /> presented in Appendix A of this Final SEIR. <br /> General Plan Amendment and Rezonings 4-19 ESA/210016 <br /> Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report December 2011 <br />