Laserfiche WebLink
Comment Letter 5 <br /> Janice Stem <br /> November 11,2011 <br /> Page 2 <br /> than the 345 units and 40,000 sf neighborhood-serving retail that we have actually proposed for our T5-2 <br /> development of Site 8. cont. <br /> In order to assure the most accurate and informative Final SEIR,we respectfully request that you have <br /> the City's transportation consultant Fehr&Peers prepare an updated technical memo, for inclusion <br /> within the final Transportation Analysis,that: (i)clarifies the use and trip generation assumptions for <br /> Site 8; (ii)clarifies that the trip generation for Site 8 based on the scenario of 159 units and 163,000 sf <br /> retail is greater than the trip generation for Site 8 based on the correct Project Description and our 5-3 <br /> proposed development of Site 8 with 345 units and 40,000 sf retail; and(iii) establishes that such <br /> clarifications do not result in any new or increased transportation impacts not analyzed in the DSEIR. <br /> In addition, the consultant should make the technical correction to the appropriate tables in its <br /> Transportation Analysis to reflect, with respect to Site 8, both the correct Project Description and <br /> Alternative 4, Increased Density. _ <br /> Thank you for your consideration of these comments. If there are any questions I can be reached at <br /> 650-377-5805 or kbusch a,srgnc.com <br /> Sincerely, <br /> f <br /> Ken Busch <br /> Project Manager <br /> E and S Ring Site 8 <br /> cc: Brian Dolan—Planning Director <br /> John Pringle—E&S Ring <br />