Laserfiche WebLink
selected for rezoning. A table showing HCD's comments and staffs draft responses is <br /> included as Attachment 9, and Attachment 10 includes several inserts into the <br /> Background document and amendments to the Goal, Policies and Programs <br /> (Attachment 8). These are the same documents as provided to the Planning <br /> Commission on December 14, 2011. <br /> Staff is in the process of preparing final edits to the draft Housing Element and will <br /> present a revised document incorporating all the inserts and including the newly <br /> rezoned sites in the City's housing inventory when the City Council considers the <br /> Housing Element for adoption in early February 2012. <br /> SITES AND PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGES <br /> A large part of the discussion during the Housing Element update has been related to <br /> the appropriate location, size and density of sites needed to accommodate the City's <br /> remaining share of the regional housing need. Information on the 17 sites which were <br /> included in the Draft Housing Element can be found in Attachment 19 (Table) and <br /> Attachment 20 (Map). More recently, staff has recalculated the remaining need, based <br /> on counting only the income-restricted units on the two BRE projects currently under <br /> review by the City in Hacienda Business Park. This recalculation showed that the City's <br /> need for housing sites for moderate income households has been met, and the <br /> remaining need is for 70 acres of land to be designated with a minimum residential <br /> density of 30 units per acre, or 2,088 units. Table 1 below shows staff's <br /> recommendation for meeting this remaining need. The list of sites represents a small <br /> surplus of units over the 2,088 required. Staff believes the surplus is appropriate given <br /> that HCD could possibly reject one of the sites in its review of the adopted Housing <br /> Element. Further, the City would get credit for any additional units in the next Housing <br /> Element planning period. The City Council may, of course, adopt a list including fewer <br /> units. Attachment 21 shows a map of the recommended potential housing sites. <br /> At the December 6 Joint Workshop, it was suggested that additional density be <br /> accommodated on TOD sites such as the Stoneridge Shopping Center, which is <br /> proposed to accommodate 400 units at a minimum of 40 units per acre, and Carr- <br /> America which was proposed at 30 units per acre. Subsequent discussion with the <br /> representative of these sites indicates that the Simon Group (Stoneridge Mall) is not <br /> willing to endorse a higher minimum density; however, Carr-America will commit to a <br /> minimum density of 35 units per acre, increasing the housing on that site from 252 to <br /> 294 housing units. This increase on the CarrAmerica site is reflected in Table 1, below. <br /> Two Council members also expressed a concern that 345 units was too many units for <br /> the Auf der Maur site, and that the high density residential portion of that site should be <br /> reduced to 10 acres from 11.5. <br /> As previously noted, this list represents a geographic distribution of properties <br /> throughout the City that eliminates any concentration of new multifamily residential <br /> development in any one neighborhood or area of Pleasanton. The sites in Table 1 are <br /> located around the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station and Stoneridge Shopping <br /> Center area, the Hacienda Park area, and in south and east Pleasanton, with no one <br /> area having a disproportionate amount of potential new multifamily sites. <br /> Page 9 of 12 <br />