06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mitigation Measure 4.N-7 would reduce the project contribution to cumulative impacts. Mitigation Measure 4.N-7: Prior to issuance of building permits, the City shall require developers on the potential sites for rezoning to contribute fair-share funds through the payment of the City of Pleasanton and Tri- Valley Regional traffic impact fees to help fund future improvement to local and regional roadways. While the City of Pleasanton is a partner with and participates in the Tri-Valley Transportation Council and the Tri-Valley regional transportation fee, funds are collected over time and it may be some time before these funds are used for projects that would specifically improve Sunol Boulevard or parallel corridors. The FSEIR also includes text changes to the DSEIR. Changes include minor text corrections; clarifications regarding site assumptions; revisions to Mitigation 4.B-4 to better reflect the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's requirements related to toxic air contaminants; revisions to Mitigation 4.J-7 clarifying that single-event aircraft noise mitigation is not needed on sites on/near Hacienda Business Park; additional land use traffic summary details for Site 8 (Auf der Maur/Rickenbach), clarifying that development of Site 8 with 345 multifamily homes and 40,000 square feet of retail is not expected to result in worse intersection service levels than anticipated in the DSEIR; and revisions to the land use and corresponding demand assumptions, but not to the mitigation measure recommended, in the Water Supply Assessment. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program When approving projects with SEIRs that identify significant impacts, CEQA requires a public agency to adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) to mitigate or avoid the identified significant effects. Only mitigations recommended to be adopted to address significant impacts are included in this program. The MMRP is included in Chapter 6 of the FSEIR. HCD REVIEW HCD's letter and appendix of October 14, 2011 (Attachment 4), is an exhaustive analysis from the State's perspective of the adequacy of the City's Draft Housing Element. It is organized around the major requirements of Housing Element law, as follows: • Housing Needs, Resources and Constraints; • Quantified Objectives; • Housing Programs; and • Consistency with the General Plan HCD's comments range from requests for additional information documenting housing need for extremely low income households and ability to pay for housing, to requests for additional analysis related to the constraints to housing imposed by land use controls, and the feasibility and capacity for residential development on some of the sites Page 8 of 12