My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
120611
>
20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2011 11:35:46 AM
Creation date
11/30/2011 4:00:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
20
Document Relationships
13
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2011\111511
13 Attachments
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2011\111511
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w <br /> KIER t WRIGHT <br /> Civil Engineers E Surveyors, Inc. <br /> We will assume, for the purposes of this discussion, that the illustration of"Canyon Avenue" on this <br /> map was an easement for "roadway" purposes for the benefit of the lots in the subdivision. There are <br /> many components to a'roadway". In 1894 there most likely would have been a raised narrow dirt or <br /> gravel roadbed with drainage ditches on both sides. There would have been culverts at the low spots. <br /> possibly trees to shade the travelers, fences to keep livestock out of the roadway and possibly signs to <br /> direct the travelers. None of these "roadway" appurtenances would have prevented the users of the <br /> casement from enjoying the benefit of their right to travel the roadway. <br /> One must understand that an easement is a right for a specific purpose over the lands of a burdened <br /> party that benefits a second party. The existence of an easement does not prevent the owner of the <br /> land ruin using his property for any purpose that does not prevent the holder of the easement from <br /> enjoying the easement for the purpose intended. In the case we are discussing this would not have <br /> been a right that was specifically defined in scope and this easement would not be exclusive to any <br /> one property owner or their successors in interest. The existence in 1894 of the ditches, signs. trees. <br /> culverts. other necessary roadway appurtenances and even partial cultivation of the easement area. <br /> • would not have stopped the parties from enjoying their"roadway" <br /> • <br /> In the modern world. traffic and safety considerations have necessitated a change in the way <br /> roadways are designed. There must be pavement to create an all weather driving surface free from <br /> dust and mud,curbs and gutters to control the flow of rainwater and to channel traffic. median islands <br /> to increase traffic safety. sidewalks to provide safe access for pedestrians and school children, street <br /> lights and signals to increase neighborhood safety, traffic signage. storm drain systems to provide for <br /> sub-surface drainage. bioswales for storm water treatment. utility lines to serve the neighborhoods. <br /> sound walls to mitigate traffic noise, landscaping to provide for an enhanced neighborhood <br /> experience. street trees to minimise the visual impact of the roadway on the houses and many other <br /> items that are necessary for a modern safe City street. In modern subdivisions and connector streets it <br /> is common far these items to he located in the public right of way or in private street easements in <br /> cases where the neighborhood has the obligation to maintain the roadways rather than the public. <br /> None of these modern items would prevent the holder of a "roadway" easement from enjoying his <br /> right to traverse the paved portion of the road. In our experience. most people prefer these amenities <br /> along the roads in their neighborhoods and would resist the idea of a full width, wall to wall. gravel or <br /> • <br /> paved 58' wide strip of asphalt in front of their house. <br /> A roadway easement is not typically intended to be an "open space''easement or a"view"easement it <br /> simply would he a non-exclusive right to pass through a portion of the lands of another over a road. <br /> street or avenue that is comprised of the driving surface itself and the other components that together <br /> complete the roadway whether modern or ancient. <br /> 4) Proposed Cameron Avenue Dedication by Pondersosa <br /> In order to better understand this situation one must remember that an easement is a right fix a <br /> specific purpose. which in this face is the right to use an ancient non-exclusive easement for roadway <br /> purposes. As there is no exclusivity to this easement the owner of the land has the ability to grant <br /> access rights to others as he wishes including dedicating the roadway to the public. This grant of <br /> additional rights will not affect the existing private easement holders from exercising their easement <br /> rights. The roadway alignment that is proposed for Tract 7721 appears to he either the same width or <br /> wider than the existing roadway and the curvilinear geometry will perhaps, serve to provide sonic <br /> traffic calming. It is interesting to note that on the north side of the street the edge of the roadway is <br /> actually located further north than its current location. <br /> 2850 Collier Canyon Road, Livermore, California 94551 (925) 245-8788 • FAX (925) 245-8796 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.