Laserfiche WebLink
8) Mr. Woodall refers to Alameda County Ordinance No. 1128 that allows a cul-de- <br /> sac at the Cameron Avenue/Courtney Drive intersection, that required a traffic <br /> signal at the Trenery Drive/Martin Avenue intersection, and that specified the <br /> development lots ranging in size from 23,000 square feet to 58,000 square feet. <br /> Response: The City's PUD zoning and development plan approvals for the <br /> Lehman-Selway property supersedes Alameda County Ordinance No. 1128. <br /> 9) Mr. Woodall states that an Environmental Impact Report should be prepared for <br /> this proposal in that the Initial Study prepared for PUD-50-01M failed to address <br /> numerous environmental issues such as riparian birds hunting, nesting, and <br /> gathering on the property, and the presence of a red fox family and its den on the <br /> property. <br /> Response: The new Initial Study prepared for the proposed project updated the <br /> project description from the 27 lots of PUD-50 to the 31 lots of PUD-50-01M and <br /> to address changes regarding air quality, Livermore airport noise, stormwater <br /> runoff treatment, and trees. At the request of staff, the applicant submitted an <br /> updated tree survey (Attachment #6) with the major modification application and <br /> then submitted an updated wildlife survey (Attachment #6) in response to the <br /> recently received public comment. Based on the analyses that have been <br /> completed for the Lehman-Selway property, the Lehman-Selway property does <br /> not provide any special habitat area, riparian habitat is not present, and the red <br /> fox is considered to be a non-native species and invasive and, therefore, does <br /> not have regulatory protection. In addition, the requirements of the previous City <br /> Council approval — for example, pre-construction surveys of protected species <br /> before grading begins — are incorporated into the draft ordinance for the 31-lot <br /> development plan. Staff concludes that the updated Initial Study and Negative <br /> Declaration are appropriate for the four-unit increase in density of this proposal. <br /> AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGGREEMENT <br /> In September, 2007, Ponderosa Homes executed an Affordable Housing Agreement for <br /> PUD-50. Attachment #9 is the existing Affordable Housing Agreement and Attachment <br /> #4 is the draft amendment to the existing Affordable Housing Agreement, amended to <br /> reflect the increase in units related to this proposal. <br /> Ponderosa has agreed to increase its one-time payment of the Lower Income Housing <br /> Fee to include the four additional units; pay the current, higher fee for all 29 new units; <br /> and to further reduce rents for five units at its Gardens at Ironwood Senior Apartments <br /> for a period of 15 years. The draft amendment to the previous agreement does not <br /> require review by the Housing Commission prior to the City Council's action on the <br /> proposed PUD modification. <br /> Page 13 of 16 <br />