My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081011
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 081011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
10/3/2011 3:47:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/10/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Blank stated that during the time he spent there watching, most of the <br />people he observed went in where the current Bernal Corners sign is; a few went in on <br />the right, and almost no one went in on the left. <br /> <br />Mr. Abbott indicated that this is exactly what the Chevron marketing people are trying to <br />address, that if you want to enter the ExtraMile Market, you enter through Bernal <br />Corners. <br /> <br />Theresa Moore stated that she lives next door to the gas station and is the original <br />owner of her property. She noted that she and her husband had spent hours at <br />Planning Commission meetings for a long time, trying to find out what was planned for <br />this site, following the process very closely, and being good neighbors. She added that <br />they were promised a lot of things such as there would be no fastfood restaurant in that <br />establishment. She indicated that a lot of time was spent by the Planning Commission, <br />the City Council, staff, and the neighbors regarding the original design and what was <br />conducive for the neighborhood. She noted that they have a unique situation in their <br />neighborhood because there is no other neighborhood in the City that sits so close to a <br />service station. She added that it was wonderful to have that input and respect when <br />that area was first being planned. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore stated that she agrees with staff that there is too much nutmeg in the <br />proposed colors. She indicated that she understood Mr. <br />difficult to depict the actual colors on slides, and she feels better seeing the colors from <br />pictures of the Danville location, which is primarily of a lighter color and not the same as <br />the darker café-au-lait and nutmeg that are being proposed on the south and east <br />elevations. She noted that these are these are very nice colors and that no one in the <br />neighborhood would have problems with them; however, it seems like they will be going <br />from white and very light yellow, which Shell has muted and goes well with the color of <br />the houses, to a darker color. She indicated that the neighborhood houses look <br />primarily light with different accents in very small portions, but none are painted in those <br />darker hues. She expressed concern that the nutmeg color will be a bit much in terms <br />of how much of it will be on these buildings, particularly on the whole backside. She <br />stated that she understood plants are being proposed but noted that vegetation does <br />not grow on the back of those walls. She noted that changing from the lighter color to <br />the proposed darker colors would be a drastic change to the neighborhood, and would <br />like to see that reduced, if possible. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore stated that she would also not be supportive of the increased height for <br />signage and was glad that staff was opposed to the video spanners. She expressed <br />concern about any additional noise at the site, which has been changing constantly and <br />compounded from what was originally proposed when they purchased their home. She <br />added that she would like to see the original guidelines put in place, that they be <br />adhered to, and that the Commission and the Council ensure that the proposed darker <br />color is significantly reduced on the buildings. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 10, 2011 Page 7 of 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.