My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081011
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 081011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
10/3/2011 3:47:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/10/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Abbott stated that from his perspective, the rear elevation in problematic because <br />there is very little articulation on it, unlike the Danville building which has an arch that <br />pulls itself out and is repeated in the rear of the building such that there are natural <br />places to break up the color. He indicated that what was proposed was based on the <br />existing landscaping and that better planting would help provide mitigation. He added <br />that he agreed with Ms. that the plants in those trellis frames will not <br />do enough because the elevation is too low, there is a soundwall there, and most of <br />these things can be seen only from the neighbor, pedestrian, and drive-through views. <br />He noted that the problem is that they will not be able to do any planting of any kind of <br />any substance under the ExtraMile/Jack in the Box panel up toward the top; and that is <br />where they stopped and said that this is where switching between the café-au-lait and <br />nutmeg colors would make sense. He added that they may probably be able to do <br />something at the drive-through as there is a natural point to change color scheme there, <br />but there is no other spot there to do so. <br /> <br />asked Mr. Abbott if they would consider swapping the colors <br />by putting the darker color in the top parapets and the lighter color below, carry it all <br />around so that the horizontal boarding and the upper area in the front are done in the <br />lighter color, and very little of the darker color on the sides. <br /> <br />Mr. Abbott replied that on the west elevation, the towers are café-au-lait and the nutmeg <br />is recessed. <br /> <br />looks like the dark and light colors are about <br />50/50 on that elevation, but almost all dark on the sides and the back. <br /> <br />Mr. Abbott explained that this is because there is no break above the entry and no <br />natural place to break the color. He noted that if the concern now is too much nutmeg, <br />the new concern would then be too much café-au-lait. <br /> <br />noted that right now the majority of the building is lighter in <br />color and suggested that the switch would lighten up the building as a whole. He added <br />that when all four sides are added up, it would take it from a 70/30 split to a 30/70 split, <br />which might relieve the concern of both the City and the neighbors while leaving <br />Chevron with its own corporate pallet. <br /> <br />Mr. Abbott stated that the south elevation would be all café-au-lait with just the nutmeg <br />cutting through. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Pavan stated that swapping the nutmeg and the café-au-lait would achieve the goal <br />of the recommendation. He added that the nutmeg could be used as a trim, or what is <br />now shown to be café-au-lait could be a cream or white, as previous suggested, and <br />would be reflective of what was shown on the Danville building. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 10, 2011 Page 8 of 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.