My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 4:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/26/2011 2:55:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor said yes. <br /> Commissioner Pearce inquired what the approximate sizes of each of the five parcels <br /> on the site were and the size of the parcel on which the existing house is located. <br /> Mr. Otto replied that he did not have that information readily available. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> David DiDonato, applicant, stated that there are 20 trees on site that have not been <br /> maintained and are not very healthy. He added that 23 trees are being removing on site <br /> and being replaced with 35 trees that meet the City's palette requirement for street trees <br /> to be planted in the frontscaping and backyards. He indicated that there are some large <br /> cedar trees in the front that are dropping branches, breaking, and dying and that there is <br /> no way to replace trees of that magnitude as they are a couple of hundred years old. <br /> Mr. DiDonato stated that they will be meeting the requirements of the City's planting but <br /> are limited with what they can plant. He added that they are paying $60,000 into the <br /> tree fund. He indicated that they have worked on this high-quality project for almost <br /> three years and are excited to bring it forward. He noted that infill projects are tough <br /> because there are many constraints and variables, and it is difficult to please everyone. <br /> He stated that they are relying on the General Plan and Specific Plan, meeting with staff <br /> and holding workshops, and feels the project is solid, architecturally outstanding, and <br /> meets density requirements. He requested the Commission to approve his project. <br /> Commissioner Pearce inquired what the size of the parcel was where the existing house <br /> is located. <br /> Mr. DiDonato replied that he believed the lot is about 5,000-6,000 square feet. <br /> Commissioner Pearce inquired if the total area of all the parcels was 46,000 square <br /> feet. <br /> Mr. DiDonato replied that he was slightly hesitant on the total square footage of the site <br /> because of the parcel that is being donated back to the City. He indicated that this <br /> information is outlined on the site plan. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he asked at a workshop two or three years ago and <br /> inquired what the selling prices of the houses would be assuming the project is <br /> approved without any substantive modifications. <br /> Mr. DiDonato replied that this is difficult to determine given the tough economy and <br /> declining market but stated that the selling price would probably be in the $500,000's. <br /> He added that there are risks involved and the reason they are pushing the project <br /> forward is because they are a small, local developer and he is confident that things are <br /> going to get better economically. He indicated that should the economy improve by the <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 15, 2010 Page 4 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.