Laserfiche WebLink
time the project comes forward and the model homes are built, they could probably sell <br /> the houses for more, although he doubts this will be the case. <br /> Commissioner Blank noted rom the workshop minutes that Mr. DiDonato had indicated <br /> then that the project would take a year to 18 months to entitle, that there are a lot of <br /> economic concerns, and :hat he estimated the home prices may be in the $750,000 to <br /> $800,000 range. <br /> Mr. DiDonato stated that They did not reduce the square footages by much; however, <br /> but 10 square feet on a house and where it has been reduced has helped them quite a <br /> bit as far as increasing the setbacks. He explained that they must accommodate the <br /> economy and what buyers will want, but they want to make money from it as well. He <br /> stated that the houses are modest and reasonable at 1 .600 square feet to just under <br /> 2,000 square feet. <br /> Commissioner Blank inquired if the construction cycle is still 12 to 18 months. <br /> Mr. DiDonato replied that he has been in construction for over 30 years and cannot <br /> explain the cycle that they are in. He indicated that in a. normal cycle, they could build <br /> homes within that timeframe, but given today's economic constraints, it is quite different. <br /> He stated that what he envisions is to build the models and then get buyers into <br /> consignment, contingent ippn construction loans. He added that this would minimize <br /> their risks. <br /> Chair Olson commented that reducing the speculative nature of the project is really <br /> smart because it is difficult to obtain loans from banks at this time. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor referred back to trees and stated that he was not asking for <br /> more trees to be planted ow wanted to make sure that whatever is put along the <br /> streetscape will grow a little taller over time. He acknowledged, however, that the <br /> developer is constrained by the City's requirements for Stanley Boulevard. <br /> Michael Palza, project architect, stated that during the work session in 2008, the <br /> 70-percent FAR presented by staff was incorrect and that they believe most of the <br /> Commissioners' comments were based on this percentage. He referred to page 18 of <br /> the staff report and stated that at that time, one Commissioner suggested that a study <br /> be conducted regarding other developments in the area and compare densities and <br /> FAR's. He noted that the City did the comparison and indicated that they are at <br /> 54-percent average FAR, which is considerably less than 70 percent. He further noted <br /> that the new homes built in :he area, with the exception of one, are all above <br /> 75 percent, 65 percent, and 97 percent. <br /> Emilie Cruzan voiced her objection to the development stating that she is concerned <br /> about the density. She poir ted out that at 54 percent, the project's FAR is greater than <br /> the townhome complex in which she lives, which is 44 percent. She inquired if there <br /> would be a condition addressing residents being required to park in their garages <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 15, 2010 Page 5 of 9 <br />