11 ATTACHMENT 04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Otto confirmed that they were. He added that the landscape architect is not looking to maximize the amount of shade and size, but rather for species and appropriateness of locations on the site. Commissioner O'Connor suggested that the Director of Community Development defer the matter to the landscape architect at the appropriate time. Commissioner Pentin referred to Condition No. 3 of the special conditions of approval which states that all uses and site development standards shall be those of the R-1-6,500 District. He indicated that he thought the zoning was being changed to High Density Residential. Mr. Otto replied that this is a standard condition used on PUDs, which utilizes single family zoning district (R-1-6,500) for uses and site development, and in the event staff misses something the applicant may want to do in the future. Commissioner Pentin referred to Condition No. 28 regarding eliminating the 1 ,375-square-foot parcel that had been previously dedicated to the City. He inquired if this would go back into the project. Mr. Otto explained that the parcel was dedicated to the City back in the 1980's, and the applicant's plan was still showing it as part of this project. He indicated that it would be a matter of erasing the lines from the plans. Commissioner Pentin noted the following typographical errors and requested that they be corrected: • Conditions Nos. 39 and 41 : "If the applicant's project precedes proceeds prior to the City's Capital Improvement Project...." • Condition No. 46: "If the applicant's project proceeds precedes the City's decision to underground.... • Condition No. 65: "...recommendations of the tree report prepared by Ed Brennan...." Commissioner O'Connor stated that he believes the fencing would propose a problem. He noted that three different fence structures are proposed: one soundwall back by the railroad tracks, and one type of fencing called a sound wood fence versus a good neighbor fence. He inquired if the wood would overlap or be caulked. He noted that it is specified in the architect's plans as a 'standard construction grade fence." He indicated that density is being upgraded and that he is not pleased with utilizing construction-grade fencing as it does not last very long in this type of environment. He recommended upgrading the fencing material to something like con-heart redwood, which is about two levels up from construction grade and would last 15 to 25 years. Commissioner Pentin asked if Commissioner O'Connor recommended that all wood fences be upgraded to con-heart redwood. EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 15, 2010 Page 3 of 9