My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
090611
>
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2011 4:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/26/2011 2:55:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 04
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Because townhomes typically c:o not have front or side yards included in the lot areas and <br /> typically have FARs exceeding 100%, a comparison of the proposed project's FARs with the <br /> adjacent Del Valle Manor townhome project would not be helpful. Staff has provided on the <br /> table below a comparison of the combined total FAR of the subject site (total square footage of <br /> all of the homes divided by the total land area of the development) and the adjacent Del Valle <br /> Manor townhouse development. <br /> Project Total Project Area Combined Total Total Project FAR <br /> House Area <br /> Proposed Project 51,135 sq. ft. 23,991 to 24,497 sq. ft. 47%to 48% <br /> PUD-82 <br /> 14 detached sin_le-family homes <br /> Del Valle Manor Townhomcs 112,454 sq. ft. ± 49,080 sq. ft. ± 44% <br /> PUD-85-07 <br /> 36 townhomes <br /> Staff finds the proposed lot sizes, house sizes, and FARs to be acceptable and consistent with <br /> the pattern of approved residem.ial development within the Downtown. <br /> Site Development Standards <br /> The applicant is not proposing house additions be allowed; therefore, there are no site <br /> development standards for futu-e additions to the homes. Staff finds the proposed homes to be <br /> adequately sized. In addition, there would be limited yard area to accommodate additions and <br /> neighbors have already expressed concerns regarding the proposed house setbacks. Therefore, <br /> staff concurs that additions s: ould nol be allowed in the development. A condition of approval <br /> addresses this item. <br /> The proposed accessory structure site development standards are generally satisfactory and <br /> similar to standards created for other small-lot developments in the City. Staff is recommending <br /> that the standards be modified to address the following items: <br /> a) Indicate that setbacks fo.7 covered patios, trellises, sheds, etc. shall be measured from the <br /> farthest architectural projection. <br /> b) Indicate that decks and patios shall not interfere with the rear or side yard drainage <br /> installed by the developer. <br /> c) Specify how setbacks are measured for the lots with the courtyards and easement areas <br /> (Lots 1-4, 9-10, and 13-- 4). <br /> d) Indicate that the wall material for detached and attached patios that are enclosed on two <br /> or more sides be limited to glass, screen lattice, or similar type of construction. Solid <br /> PUD-82 Page - 19 - September 15, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.