PC 052511 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chair Narum asked Mr. Dolan if she correctly understood that a certain square footage of retail would be required, with the rest being mixed-use, and hopefully end up in a combination of the three types. Mr. Dolan said yes, essentially with the limit being the trips that are generated. 2. Are the proposed development standards and guidelines, including the amount of development allowed, appropriate for the site? Commissioner Blank stated that he was initially skeptical and a little concerned about the development scenarios and the idea of having one big great garage structure, but after hearing the presentation, which he found to be very good and effective, the scenarios made sense to him. He indicated that he liked Option 3. Commissioner Pearce stated that she also liked Option 3 in general, but she would not sign off right now on a 10-15-story tower or 100 units/acre. She indicated that she would like to leave it flexible and is pleased with what has been presented. Chair Narum agreed and stated that she likes Option 3 the best, having the parking garage along the freeway and not along the street front. She noted, however, that she would not want to see a massive eight-story garage structure behind two-story buildings. She added that she like the idea of hiding the garage structure from the Pleasanton side, with the front street side being part of a pedestrian zone with people sitting and walking around. She indicated that she wants to ensure there is something in the guidelines to addresses that. Mr. Williams pointed out that a seven- or eight-story parking garage does not equate to a seven- or eight-story residential or office structure because garage floors are lower. Mr. Fleissig indicated that Chair Commissioner Blank inquired who would own the parking structure once it gets built. Mr. Dolan replied that this has never been done in the past and would have to be discussed. Mr. McPartland stated that this would have to be negotiated. Mr. Fleissig stated that he has approached both the BART Director and BART staff, and BART has been open to the notion that it does not have to be a BART-owned garage. He indicated that ir engineers design things is not quite massive but close to that in terms of cost per space. He noted that this product may actually serve as a great prototype for how a private developer, working in concert with BART, could actually create an environment where the garage could be built for less cost per space, meet the standards, and be more aesthetically pleasing and more flexibly designed to accommodate both future development and the commuter traffic. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 25, 2011 Page 17 of 21