PC 052511 - Laserfiche WebLink

He added that this could actually become the case study once these are adopted and once the BART Board decides they want to allow for it. He noted that there has been encouragement from all the different levels operational, staff, and the Commission that this can be a very interesting case. He added that if there is this need and demand, it actually could create the basis for this different approach to BART. Chair Narum inquired if there were adequate standards for the aesthetics of the parking garage. She indicated that she did not want to see something similar to the parking garage across the freeway. Mr. Williams stated that the key thing with parking structures is to allow them to be parking structures and, in this particular instance, keeping them relatively simple. He indicated that everybody has unanimously suggested that the one they like the most is one seen the least, at least from Owens Drive; the City would then have the ability to do a sedate building in a parking structure. He added that what the guidelines say is to have it look more like an office building, keep it simple, and try not to create articulation that ends up being value-engineered-out in a poor way. He noted that the simpler they are, the more elegant they end up looking. He noted that everyone will be much happier if the spirit is to make it look like the other buildings in the area on side of the freeway. He confirmed that these standards are in the guidelines, specifically on parking structures. Chair Narum asked Mr. Dolan if the Commission should address height as part of this question. Mr. Dolan replied that if the Commission considers it a concern, staff would like to hear about it. Commissioner Blank noted that it is so early on in the process, and anything that returns will have to be seen by the Planning Commission. He noted that it may very well be a new Commission, and while he did not think any Commission would like to have a 200-foot tower structure built, a developer may come along with a dynamic 85-foot building corner that the future Commission and staff will look at and like. Chair Narum noted that 85 feet is the maximum height allowed in the Hacienda PUD. She added, however, that a developer may want to build a 10-15-story hotel, which would be well above the 85 feet, and while she would not want to preclude this option, she did not want any developers to think that they could do that and then have it approved. She indicated that this would be a major change from the standard guidelines. Commissioner Blank stated that it would be way beyond the guidelines, and the developers would have to make a very compelling case. Mr. Fleissig explained that they tried to at least give that option without changing the guidelines, noting that the maximum height in Hacienda is 85 feet and would require a PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 25, 2011 Page 18 of 21