Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Pearce asked Commissioner Olson if he would reduce the acreage for <br />residential because what is being proposed is doing all 5.1 acres as residential. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that theoretically, the whole thing could be scraped for a project that <br />mixes some retail on the first floor and apartments above with that amount of density. <br />He noted that it would be a fairly intense project but it could be done and would be <br />similar to what was done in Hacienda but with more retail. He indicated that the <br />Commission may want to reduce it down a little bit such as removing an acre off of it, <br />provided the numbers assumed on the site do not get too high. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce concurred this is a great idea. <br /> <br />stated that he combined this with the three on the corner <br />(Sites 11, 14, and 8), as this is along the same pathway and traffic. He noted that it is <br />getting some revitalization now, although it has not gotten an anchor tenant yet. He <br />indicated that there are many homes in the area and putting in another 153 homes in <br />might add to what goes on Sites 11, 14 and 8. He thinks this is a lot for the intersection <br />at this time, although they have just improved the bridge, and he believes this is a good <br />site for the next review in the future. <br /> <br /> inquired if the property owner showed interest. <br /> <br />Chair Narum said yes and that he came and spoke to the Task Force. She noted that <br />when this site was put on the list, she assumed it was going to be mixed use much like <br />the Safeway in Dublin off of Santa Rita Road, with retail below and apartments above. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce commented that that center has a big anchor tenant and the City <br />has not been able to get an anchor tenant in this center. <br /> <br />Chair Narum stated that she is amenable to taking it down to four <br />suggestion and adding the comment about making it mixed-use. <br /> <br />Commissioners Pentin and Olson both agreed. <br /> <br />stated that he was not firmly objecting but would rather see it <br />postponed. He indicated that he thinks there will be more traffic and it is the smallest of <br />the four pieces. He noted that if the owner wants it rezoned, he would be fine with it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce stated that she thinks it is a good site for some residential, and <br />she loves the idea for mixed use; however, she has concerns about the viability of <br />something like this and also feels for the businesses there now that are thriving. She <br />indicated that she does not know how to put all that together and make it work from a <br />practical, compassionate standpoint. She noted that she is in favor of keeping the site <br />on the list, reducing it to four acres, and making it mixed-use. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, April 27, 2011 Page 31 of 40 <br /> <br />