My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 042711
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 042711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
7/18/2011 3:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/27/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
There was consensus among the Commissioners to support keeping this site on <br />the list but reducing it to four acres and proposing a mixed-use development. <br /> <br />Site 17: Axis Community Health <br /> <br />that this is a smaller infill property and he knows this is <br />what is what the Downtown wants. He voiced support for it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce said she loves the idea of bringing more people Downtown. <br /> <br />There was consensus among the Commissioners to support keeping this site on <br />the list. <br /> <br />Site 18: Downtown (SF site) <br /> <br /> that this is <br />what the Downtown wants. He stated that he thought the City wanted to develop this <br />for City offices. <br /> <br />There was consensus among the Commissioners to support keeping this site on <br />the list. <br /> <br />Site 7: Pleasanton Gateway <br /> <br />stated that he thinks 300 units is too much for the site. He <br />noted that there are already a lot of apartments across from the site. He indicated, <br />however, that he thinks it is a good site to bring in more people, given the nearby park <br />and shopping, and its walking distance to schools. He noted that this is kind of a prime <br />site and he has concerns about adding 300 units. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson noted that all his acreage adds up to 82.1, and he does not have <br />Site 7 on his list. He indicated that his concern is groundswell of public opinion, which <br />he also on the Valley Trails Church site. He inquired why not pick other sites where <br />there is not this kind of controversy going in. <br /> <br />stated that he really believes Valley Trail is a bad place to put <br />that kind of density, and he really thinks that Site 7 is a much more desirable place <br />because of its proximity to all services. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson added that it has great access to the freeway. <br /> <br />-through for shopping and <br />schools, but reiterated that he has an issue with 300 more units, whether they be <br />low-income or not. He noted that they already have a lot in there, and he would like to <br />do less than 30 units per acre and less than ten acres. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, April 27, 2011 Page 32 of 40 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.