Laserfiche WebLink
community would accept and suggested that instead of a having blanket statement at <br />this time, Building and Planning staff be provided the ability to determine at the building <br />permit stage what the best solution might be. <br />Commissioner Pentin supported this suggestion. He indicated, however, that he was <br />more concerned about the storage containers of various sizes and heights and would <br />like to have staff work this out as they are part of the layout of the use of the building. <br />Mr. Pavan suggested that Condition No. 31 be modified to state that storage containers <br />will be lower than the height of the fence to minimize the visual impact of the equipment, <br />at the discretion of the Director of Community Development. <br />Commissioners Blank and Pentin accepted the amendment. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, O’Connor, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Narum. <br />Resolution No. PC-2010-28 recommending approval of Case PUD-80-16-13M was <br />entered and adopted as motioned. <br />b. PUD-82, David DiDonato, Donato Builders, Inc. <br />Application for Planned Unit Development Rezoning of an <br />approximately 1.17-acre site located at 4171 and 4189 Stanley Boulevard <br />from R-1-6,500 (One-Family Residential) District to Planned Unit <br />Development – High Density Residential (PUD-HDR) District and for <br />Development Plan approval to construct 14 detached single-family <br />homes. <br />Steve Otto presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key elements <br />of the project. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he took issue with a comment made regarding the <br />Commission not being clear about density. He indicated that he had read the Minutes; <br />all five Commissioners expressed concern about density, and four of the five <br />Commissioners recommended removal of a unit or a significant reduction in floor area <br />ratios (FAR). <br />Mr. Otto agreed that the Commission concurred about reducing the FAR; however, with <br />respect to density or the number of units, he understood from his reading of the Minutes <br />that some Commissioners did support the proposed density. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 15, 2010 Page 9 of 23 <br /> <br />