Laserfiche WebLink
After informally consulting with the other Commissioners, Chair Olson indicated that <br />they had sufficient information and that the presentation would not be necessary. <br />Commissioner Pentin indicated that he likes the project and has enough information to <br />make a decision. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Chair Olson advised that two motions would be made: the first to address the Mitigated <br />Negative Declaration, and the second to address the PUD modification. <br />Commissioner Blank moved to find that the proposed project will not have a <br />significant environmental impact and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is <br />appropriate, and to recommend approval of the Initial Study and the Mitigated <br />Negative Declaration. <br />Commissioner Pearce seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, O’Connor, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Narum. <br />Resolution No. PC-2010-27 recommending approval of the Initial Study and the <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />Commissioner Blank moved to make the PUD Development Plan Findings as <br />stated in the staff report and to recommend approval of Case PUD 80-16-13M, <br />subject to the Conditions of Approval as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report, <br />with the following modifications: (1) Modify Condition No. 26 to require additional <br />building detailing on the west building elevation for visual interest and to relieve <br />the flat appearance of the elevation; and (2) Modify Condition No. 31 to require <br />that the height of storage containers be lower than that of the perimeter service <br />yard fence to completely screen the storage containers, as approved by the <br />Director of Community Development. <br />Commissioner Pentin seconded the motion. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED. <br />Mr. Herman stated that the storage containers are clearly not part of the approval <br />process but of the building permit process.He indicated that some horizontal storage <br />units are planned below the fence lines, but there will be some vertical storage tanks <br />that will be taller than a fence. He indicated that the fence will be one that the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 15, 2010 Page 8 of 23 <br /> <br />