My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091510
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 091510
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 3:27:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/15/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan added that intensity would be measured by the FAR and that density is <br />measured as units per acre. <br />Commissioner Blank noted that the number of units is the same and it appears that with <br />respect to the house sizes, Plan 1 has been reduced by 10 square feet, and Plan 2 has <br />been reduced by 32 square feet. He inquired if staff considers this to be a significant <br />enough reduction to make a real impact, given the number of Plan 1 and Plan 2 units <br />and only one unit of Plan 3. <br />Mr. Otto replied that staff did not feel there was an exact number that the homes had to <br />be reduced by. He added that staff agrees that the square footage of the first two <br />models was not reduced substantially; however, the third model which was originally <br />over 2,000 square feet has been reduced to 1,920 square feet. <br />Commissioner Blank corrected his earlier statement that there was only one unit of <br />Plan 3; he noted that there are three Plan 3 units. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that there had been a lot of discussion and concern <br />from the Commission and the public regarding parking. He inquired if parking would be <br />an issue if everything were done according to the proposal. He further inquired how the <br />City would police the parking and the restriction of not utilizing garages for storage. <br />Mr. Otto replied that ideally, the City would not police the parking or garage use. He <br />stated that it would be included in the requirements of the CC&R’s and recorded with <br />the properties, and the residents themselves would take care of it. He added that there <br />may be situations where the City may have to go in and enforce the conditions of <br />approval imposed on the project. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired if there was a condition that this be included in the <br />CC&R’s. <br />Mr. Otto replied that it is generally stated in the condition regarding separate recorded <br />documents, but staff could add this to ensure it is included in the CC&R’s. <br />Chair Olson noted that parking has been improved by adding guest parking on site. He <br />inquired if there would be issues with the fire turn-around if all guest spaces were <br />occupied by automobiles. <br />Mr. Otto replied that the Fire Department has reviewed the turn-around and has signed <br />off on it. <br />Commissioner O’Connor acknowledged that a fee is being paid to the City to plant trees <br />elsewhere; however, he would like the developer to plant trees back into this site to <br />provide immediate shade. He inquired if any of the trees would be as big as they are <br />today and if any were oak trees. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 15, 2010 Page 10 of 23 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.