Laserfiche WebLink
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, O’Connor, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Narum. <br />Resolution No. PC-2010-26 approving Case PCUP-279 was entered and adopted as <br />motioned. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />a. PUD-80-16-13M, Paul Thometz, LBA Realty <br />Application for a modification to an approved PUD Development Plan <br />for an approximately 65,000-square-foot, two-story research and <br />development building with an enclosed outdoor service yard on the <br />northwest corner of a developed 26.15-acre site located at 4900-5040 <br />Johnson Drive. Zoning for the Property is PUD-I/C-O (Planned Unit <br />Development – Industrial/ Commercial- Office) District. <br />Also consider the Negative Declaration prepared for the project. <br />Marion Pavan presented the staff report and described the scope, layout and key <br />elements of the project. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that page 14 of the staff report recommends the addition of <br />two conditions which reflect the additional shrubbery and the landscaping to be used to <br />break up the wall massing. <br />Commissioner O’Connor noted that there was more than landscaping and inquired if a <br />decorative metal architectural detail would be added. <br />Mr. Pavan apologized that the two items on page 14 were inadvertently omitted from <br />Condition No. 26 of Exhibit A, on page 6 under Landscape Design. He suggested that <br />the Commission recommend including this in the condition when the motion is made. <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that on page 9 of the staff report, it states that the service <br />yard will be screened by a 12-foot to 14-foot tall solid metal fence, and Condition No. 31 <br />of Exhibit A on page 7 states that all equipment including storage containers that may <br />be visible above the service yard fence shall be painted to match the building. He <br />inquired if the storage containers in the service yard were not anticipated to be taller <br />than 14 feet. <br />Mr. Pavan replied that the condition is used as a back-up in the event that some of the <br />storage containers may be visible. He noted that the applicant has assured staff that <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 15, 2010 Page 6 of 23 <br /> <br />