My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
041911
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2011 9:58:16 AM
Creation date
4/13/2011 12:17:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/19/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• When copying and pasting into ZoomGrants, some punctuation marks <br /> were changed to something else. Also spell check would be nice <br /> • Print is very small <br /> • Easy to save, preview, edit and review <br /> • Being able to submit electronically more convenient <br /> • 2,000 word limit to answer questions; satisfactory space except for <br /> community collaborations question <br /> • Some difficulty uploading; City staff very helpful <br /> • Somehow ended up starting new apps, even when trying to continue to <br /> initial app; this affected my notice that grant was received because they <br /> had others they were waiting for <br /> • Easy! <br /> • Ability to log out and have information saved; paperless submission. Did <br /> not like inability to format the information into columns <br /> • Liked the way the complete document printed out <br /> • The character counter was very helpful. Initially it was difficult to figure out <br /> how to open a second application for the same funding opportunity. This <br /> was updated by ZoomGrants during the application phase and was an <br /> excellent improvement <br /> 10. Take an opportunity to provide us with any general or specific feedback <br /> regarding the questions in the application (e.g., detail, length, clarity, <br /> etc.) <br /> • Good questions and appreciated the length (neither too long or too short <br /> for responses) <br /> • Putting a word limit on each answer caused us to focus our answers - <br /> excellent idea <br /> • Some seemed a bit repetitive, but overall they were easy to answer <br /> • Clear and concise <br /> • Appreciated the more specific questions <br /> • Some questions were vague and I wasn't sure what was being asked <br /> • ZoomGrants saved everything and it was easy to access the program <br /> again <br /> 11. Were the application deadlines reasonable? Do you feel you were given <br /> adequate time to complete the application? <br /> • Yes <br /> • Helped to have reminder emails <br /> • Difficult to complete more than one, given time constraints <br /> • Timeline was fine but end of January is a difficult time due to quarterly <br /> reports for various agencies being due that month <br /> • Very reasonable <br /> Page 30 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.