Laserfiche WebLink
Mitigated/ <br />Resolved <br />Applicant Compromise / Resolution / Rebuttal <br />Resolution: David, Stephanie, Hans, and Roxana's homes are <br />to the south of the proposed addition. There is no shadow that is <br />ever cast upon their property from the applicants property. <br />Resolution: With respect to the zoning regulations there is <br />nothing unique about the proposed addition. There are NO <br />variances requested and the proposed addition meets or <br />exceeds all zoning regulations. Lot size, not lot shape, plays a <br />key role in determining if a unique situation exists, with respect t <br />the zoning regulations. In addition there are four other propertie- <br />in the Val Vista development that have two story homes located <br />in the same area, at the end of the cul -de -sac. By definition this <br />means that this is not a unique situation. <br />Resolution: This is simply not true. The proposed addition will <br />not be the largest two story home or the largest single story hom: <br />in the entire Val Vista community. In fact the largest home in th= <br />entire Val Vista neighborhood will continue to be David and <br />Stephanie Persin's home (the appellants). The proposed <br />addition will also not be the largest Floor Area Ratio in Val Vista <br />In addition the proposed square footage of the applicants home <br />will be in the range of homes in Val Vista and even in the home <br />in a 100 Square foot radius. <br />Mitigation: The proposed home would be situated more than <br />60ft away from the appellants rear patio and pool and has been <br />designed with a roof with minimal slope, to reduce the size. Nevi <br />landscaping will also be planted to block their view and give a <br />more natural comforting feeling to the appellants. <br />Resolution: Building only on top of the garage does not give <br />the space that the applicant's require, would not look well <br />proportioned, and perhaps give the appearance of a poorly <br />designed home, possibly having a negative effect on neighboring <br />property values <br />Resolution: Building on first story only does not give the space <br />that the applicants require, would still require that a second story <br />addition would still be needed of similar size, takes the yard awa <br />from the kids, creates odd shape rooms and awkward shaped <br />backyard, and raises costs drastically. <br />Raised By: <br />David and Stephanie Persin <br />Hans and Roxana Hoehne <br />David and Stephanie Persin <br />David and Stephanie Persin <br />David and Stephanie Persin <br />David and Stephanie Persin <br />David and Stephanie Persin <br />Appellant Issue / Argument <br />Proposed addition will cast shadow on property <br />The proposed addition creates a unique situation because of the <br />property shape and the vicinity of the properties <br />The proposed addition will make the applicant's home the largess <br />two story home in the Val Vista community <br />Don't want to see a big building and would experience a more <br />closed in feeling <br />Only build a second story on top of garage <br />Expand on first story only <br />ik <br />CO <br />N <br />m <br />0 <br />° <br />r <br />