My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 112502
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
PC 112502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:47:57 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 8:49:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/25/2002
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 112502
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin stated he understands the concerns of the neighbors, but he does not agree. <br />He stated that he completely agrees with the analogy regarding power cables, because he has <br />seen data to show the issue of the power cables, but he personally has not seen any data related to <br />cellular antennas. Commissioner Arkin stated that he doesn't see any harm from a technical <br />perspective, and some people would see value in having a home close to an antenna. <br /> <br />Chairperson Maas advised that she will support the motion, noting that the applicant is abiding <br />by the ordinance. She asked if staff has considered when the ordinance might be reviewed. Mr. <br />Iserson noted that it would be a good idea to go back and review the ordinance to see if the field <br />has changed to the extent where it may affect the ordinance. Also, there is a built-in review <br />period in the ordinance, which staff with check. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSTAIN: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Commissioners Arkin, Kameny, Maas, and Roberts <br />Commissioner Sullivan <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-2002-73 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />Chairperson Maas advised that the Planning Commission's action can be appealed to the City <br />Council. <br /> <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> <br />a. PDR-244, BahmaD Tehrani <br />Application for design review approval for new building colors and new awnings <br />and to re-face an existing projecting sign for a building located at 500 Main <br />Street. Zoning for the property is C-C (Central Commercial) District, Downtown <br />Revitalization District. <br /> <br />Jerry Iserson presented the staff report, noting that the applicant has provided color elevations for <br />the Planning Commission's review which show the building colors, awning colors, and proposed <br />signage. Mr. Iserson provided an overview of the colors. He noted that staff is satisfied with the <br />colors and signage, finds them to be consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines, and <br />recommends approval per the conditions in the staff report. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Sullivan, Mr. Iserson advised that the neon tubes <br />in the cornice was previously denied by the Commission, <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin inquired whether all of the work on the windows has been completed, with <br />the exception ofthe painting. He advised that the window on the left has not yet been <br />lengthened. Mr. Iserson explained that the work on the other windows is complete, but there is <br />still an issue with the last window because a restroom is located behind that window and the <br />applicant is working with staff to find a way to resolve the problem. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />November 25, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.