PC 112502 - Laserfiche WebLink

,,- Commissioner Sullivan stated that he agrees with what the Commission is trying to do and he supports that idea, but because of his concerns related to infrastructure he cannot vote to say that the report is adequate ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Commissioners Arkin, Kameny, Maas, and Roberts Commissioner Sullivan None None Resolution No. PC-2002-76 was entered and adopted as motioned. Commissioner Sullivan moved to: (1) grant the reallocations for the developers that signed the Vineyard Corridor development agreements; (2) grant the PonderosalBusch property project reallocations; (3) include the golf course projects as major project allocations; (3) set the first-come, first-served projects at a baseline of zero, but to consider first-come, first-served projects on a case-by-case basis by either the Planning Commission or City Council in order to allow projects considered to be desirable to move forward, but still address the infrastructure concerns; (4) not shift the 14 units from first-come, first-served to major projects in 2004; and (5) reclassify the McCurdy project as first-come, first- served. r Commissioner Sullivan noted that he feels this will allow projects to go forward that they have agreed are important and allows them to look at other projects on a case-by-case basis and address some of the concerns. Chairperson Maas stated that she feels comfortable with staff s recommendation because the Planning Commission has the opportunity to review growth management annually. She further stated that the idea of controlled or managed growth is healthy, seems realistic, and gives the community the amenities such as expansion or building of new schools, parks, library expansion, and a new city hall. She advised that she is concerned about the issue of water, but according to the staff report this area is being monitored, and, therefore, she is comfortable with staff s recommendation, She stated that she senses some frustration with the two developers that have not signed the development agreement and she wonders why that has not happened. Commissioner Maas stated that she supports staff's recommendation. Commissioner Sedlak stated that he feels Commissioner Sullivan's motion is very thoughtful, but he is concerned about the portion of the motion that would allow good projects to be brought forward before others. He noted that he is under the impression that staff will sort those out first and he wonders that if the statement included in the motion tends to be discriminatory based on one's own personal likes and dislikes about a project. He advised that if Commissioner Sullivan could explain this provision it would help him make a decision about supporting the motion. - Commissioner Sullivan stated that he did not mean it as a judgement as to which projects would come forward, but his intent was that it would give the opportunity for approval of projects that PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 25, 2002 Page 13