Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r was requested before the Plan is brought to City Council. The organizational structure and <br />operational format would be developed after that in order to pursue the action items. <br /> <br />Ms. Eisenwinter advised that the members of the EAG would like it to become a formal <br />committee with regular meetings. Their first priority will be to address the highest priority action <br />items. For each action item, they would develop a scope of work, a schedule, and a budget for <br />the Council's review. The Energy Plan has been reviewed twice by the Economic Vitality <br />Committee; in general, their comments were very positive. The Economic Vitality Committee <br />recommended that the Energy Plan and the Generator Siting Ordinance move through the public <br />review process as a single item. However, the EAG recommends that the Energy Plan move <br />through the process first because it is ready to go, and the Generator Siting Ordinance needs <br />additional work. In addition, the Energy Plan is broader in scope than the Generator Siting <br />Ordinance. <br /> <br />Ms. Eisenwinter noted that the EAG recommends that a formal size-limited Energy Committee <br />be created by the City Council. The Economic Vitality Committee thought it might be best that <br />the Committee remain an informal group that anyone could join at any time. <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Roberts' inquiry, Mr. Baker replied that locally distributed power <br />is a concept which moved away from a large central power facility in a single location. It would <br />put smaller generators in more opportunistic locations, and would use smaller generators from <br />one to ten megawatts. He noted that when electricity is transmitted over the grid from a central <br />power station, there is a seven percent loss of energy versus locally distributed power. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Jennifer Hosterman, 2922 Chardonnay Drive, thanked City staff for their hard work and prompt <br />replies during the past eighteen months. She believed the Energy Plan was solid, and hoped that <br />the Planning Commission would support it. She wished to draw the Commission's attention to <br />several letters of support <br /> <br />Ms. Hosterman noted that a letter received from Judy Corbett of the Local Government <br />Commission on October 18, 2002, stated that everyone benefited from having a forward-looking <br />government such as Pleasanton, and that the LGC supported the Energy Plan wholeheartedly. <br /> <br />The following letter was received from the Kathy M. Pierce, Director ofthe Seattle Regional <br />Office of the U.S. Department of Energy: <br /> <br />"Mayor Tom Pico and City Council Members: <br /> <br />,--. <br /> <br />Matt Sullivan recently provided my office with a copy of the Pleasanton Energy Plan <br />prepared under the direction of the City of Pleasant on's Energy Advisory Group. The <br />proposed plan is an excellent example of the type of comprehensive community strategy <br />the Department of Energy encourages. By outlining energy and water conservation, along <br />with reliable electric power and renewable power generation, the Plan can be an <br />important step towards creating a more secure energy future for the City of Pleasanton." <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />October 23, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />