My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 102302
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
PC 102302
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:47:15 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 8:44:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/23/2002
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 102302
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />."^" <br /> <br />. Enhance the general quality oflife through energy strategies that will benefit <br />the community. <br />. Promote ecologically friendly propositions that create a healthy <br />environment. <br />. Promote good stewardship through energy conservation and efficiency <br />practices. <br />. Support opportunities for local economic vitality. <br />. Emphasize sustainable/renewable power sources. <br />. Favor locally distributed power opportunities. <br />. Support options that will reduce market volatility, stabilize rates, and <br />increase reliability. <br /> <br />Ms. Eisenwinter noted that there was an emphasis in the Plan to protect the environment, improve <br />the community's quality oflife, support opportunities that would increase local economic vitality, <br />stabilize energy rates, and increase energy reliability for both the business and residential <br />community. <br /> <br />Mr. Baker noted that the group identified several key elements: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Assets: The area contains a technically sophisticated, highly educated populace, <br />and local organizations to match that description; <br />Opportunities: Beneficial climate, location for renewable energy sources, and <br />community support for quality of life issues. <br />Barriers: Resistance to change, a reluctance to accept new technological <br />solutions, and the current energy market volatility. <br /> <br />r-- <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Ms. Eisenwinter noted that the Plan contained a more detailed list of Assets, Opportunities, and <br />Barriers in Attachment C. <br /> <br />Mr. Baker noted that an extensive Action Plan was developed, broken down into six general <br />categories: <br /> <br />1. Advocacy and education; <br />2. Reducing Pleasanton's energy demand; <br />3. Supporting and developing ordinances, policies, and legislation; <br />4. Develop financial possibilities; <br />5. Creating alliances; and <br />6. Improving Pleasanton's energy supply. <br /> <br />Ms. Eisenwinter described the Action Plan in further detail, as described in the staff report. She <br />noted that the action items were in approximate order of priority by the group members. <br /> <br />".-. <br /> <br />Mr. Baker noted that implementation of the action items was the next step, and noted that the <br />Economic Vitality Committee had already provided its input. The Planning Commission's input <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />October 23, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.