My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092502
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
PC 092502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:46:56 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 8:41:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2002
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 092502
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,--. <br /> <br />been finalled. If the applicant had completed the certification procedure, they may not <br />need the subsequent reviews. Staff built the flexibility into the Ordinance so the Green <br />Building Compliance Official may reduce or eliminate the documentation requirements. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sullivan regarding page 14, Item 2, Mr. <br />Syphers replied that non-conditioned spaces were exempted from the Ordinance because <br />energy was a major part of LEED. It would be difficult to meet the same standard <br />because so many credits were available for being energy efficient; those credits would be <br />unavailable if there was minimal energy use. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that there were many opportunities in lighting and building <br />materials. <br /> <br />Chairperson Maas noted that the applicant could use their best efforts to retain the LEED <br />credits. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted the use of "best efforts" was the basis of the green building <br />concept. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts, Ms. Syphers confirmed that the new <br />temperature-controlled winery building would be a conditioned space. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts, Mr. Iserson noted that borderline <br />I cases would be subject to interpretation. A new building that was being constructed to <br />look like a historic building, or that would use historic materials, would have other <br />opportunities to achieve credits in other design and construction features, siting, and <br />landscaping. Staff would decide whether an exemption or hardship application would be <br />appropriate on a case-by-case basis. <br /> <br />Ms. Maier noted that if the Ordinance were adopted, implementation would include staff <br />training regarding the checklists and green building standards. Staff members have <br />already attended several U.S. Green Building Council workshops; staffplarmers and <br />Building Department officials will continue to attend intermediate and advanced level <br />LEED workshops. An implementation strategy would be developed with the Alameda <br />County Waste Management Authority to develop checklists for building inspectors and <br />staff plarmers. <br /> <br />Ms. Maier noted that a Green Building Consultant would be retained to answer questions <br />that staff may not be able to answer. The consultant would be a LEED-accredited <br />professional. Education would figure prominently in the efforts to ensure compliance. <br />Free workshops had been hosted by the City and the Alameda County Waste <br />Management Authority, targeted toward architects and property owners to familiarize <br />them with LEED and green building in general. She believed that as the details were <br />defined, more workshops would be held. She noted that a green building display was <br />placed in the lobby of City Hall to familiarize the general public, and that the information <br />.-- would be rotated. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />September 25, 2002' <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.