My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092502
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
PC 092502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:46:56 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 8:41:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2002
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 092502
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Syphers noted that a new release was generally a simplification of the old version, <br />r and did not believe that the old version would be a benefit to the developer. He believed <br />the trend would hold for five or six years, and that the versions would not be radically <br />different. He believed that six months would be adequate to incorporate any changes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan believed that if a project was approved at a certain LEED <br />version, they would use that version throughout the entire process. <br /> <br />Mr. Syphers noted that one exception might be if a project was approved, but was not <br />built for years. <br /> <br />Ms. Maier advised that another modification regarded the substitution of credits. During <br />compliance review for covered projects, there would be some flexibility for the Green <br />Building Compliance Official to substitute the approved credits for alternate credits. The <br />substitution would only occur at the request of the applicant when it was determined that <br />the originally approved credits were no longer feasible. This modification was developed <br />because of concerns from Hacienda Business Park developers with regard to commercial <br />interiors. When the tenants have not yet been identified, it would be difficult to claim the <br />credits at that point. The Green Building Official could work with the developer to <br />substitute credits if that issue arose. <br /> <br />Ms. Maier advised that staff recommended two further modifications based on recent <br />feedback from David Gottfried, specifically pertaining to the definition of the LEED <br />r- green building rating system. Previously, the LEED rating system was identified to mean <br />the most recent version of the LEED Green Commercial Rating System, currently version <br />2.0. Because other LEED products were in the pipeline, those pilot projects may be <br />more appropriate to apply to a project. The following language was added: <br /> <br />"The LEED Green Building Rating System means the most recent version <br />of the leadership and energy and environmental design, commercial green <br />building system, or other related LEED rating system approved by the <br />U.S. Green Building Council. As new rating systems are developed by the <br />U.S. Green Building Council, the Green Building Compliance Official <br />shall have the authority to specify the applicable LEED rating system for a <br />covered project. For the first six months after the release of any new <br />version of the Green Building Rating System, the applicant shall be given <br />the choice of using the most current version, or the version to be <br />superseded. City staff shall maintain the most recent version of the <br />applicable rating systems at all times." <br /> <br />Ms. Maier advised that the last change to the Ordinance dealt with projects which would <br />go through the U.S. Green Building Council for certification. Staff believed that projects <br />that completed the documentation to attain the certification may not need the type of <br />verification required in the Ordinance. The timing of the certification would be important <br />to this determination. A review would occur prior to issuing the final Occupancy Permit <br />- for the project, at one year, and then, on rare occasions, five years after the project has <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />September 25, 2002' <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.