PC 081402 - Laserfiche WebLink

--- a temporary driveway connection may be created. There may be a way to create the six lots, although there may be a time lag before it could be built upon. Mr. Roush noted that staff could recommend, without modifying the finance plan per se, that the Specific Plan fees would be paid for the five lots, and that the fees for Lot 6 could be postponed until the building permit was pulled. Chairperson Maas believed that was a fair proposition. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS REOPENED. Ms. Roberts noted that many of properties along Vineyard were already in delay mode until the road is built. She noted that when Greenbriar came before the Commission for the Heinz property, they requested an exception to start building before the road was realigned. The original plan was that they could not do anything until the road realignment was completed. She did not agree that it would be a good idea to change the financing plan. Chairperson Maas noted that delay in development would also delay the payment of the fee, and added that the Hahner access was preferable to the vineyard route. Until Hahner were developed, this lot would not be able to be developed, and the fee would be delayed. ,--. Commissioner Arkin believed that the design guidelines should be very tight, especially on Lot 6. Steve Brozosky cautioned the Commission on splitting the properties apart in the finance plan. He believed the same problem would occur on all the hillside residences, which would be custom lots. He believed that if the finance plan were to be changed, it would open a can of worms. Mr. Pavan noted that the purpose ofthe Specific Plan fees were to finance the infrastructure to serve the Vineyard Avenue area, including School Street. Staff wanted to see the money for the infrastructure to be paid to the City as quickly as possible, so that it could finance streets, trails, and so forth. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Chairperson Maas noted that new photomontages will be needed if the lot details changed. Mr. Pavan noted that could be accomplished. Chairperson Maas noted that Question 2 on page 5 already described strict guidelines for Lot 6. Chairperson Maas noted that regarding Question 3, staff favored the hammerhead turn- around, rather than a cul-de-sac. Mr. Pavan stated that the hammerhead took less area, ___ and would not encroach onto Lot 4. The Commission concurred. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 18