PC 081402 - Laserfiche WebLink

--- change that to five lots, it would require an amendment to the financing plan to be approved by the City Council. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Maas, Mr. Roush noted that if the number of lots were to be reduced, he would be concerned about the financing plan. He noted that it was crafted with a lot of compromises, and that any modification would probably lead to further modifications by other parties. He would be reluctant to reopen that issue if at all possible. Chairperson Maas observed that there was some consensus regarding keeping the six lots, but not limiting them to a single story. Mr. Pavan had discussed the home design with Ms. Chavez. He noted that as long as the height was maintained at 25 feet, and that it appeared to be a one-story house with a sloped roof, the Park District could accept that design. The District did not want to see a typical 30-foot tall two-story house. Chairperson Maas preferred the use of design guidelines, so that a homeowner could build a custom home. Commissioner Arkin believed that it would be important to know what the house would look like and to use the administrative design review. r-- Mr. Pavan noted that staff would have to craft design guidelines for the six units, using the guidelines in the Specific Plan. When the PUD came to the Commission, the design guidelines would be attached for the Commission's review. Commissioner Kameny noted that he had a great deal offaith in staff. Commissioner Kameny inquired what would happen ifMr. Hahner did develop his property. Mr. Roush noted that there were two issues, and that Commissioner Arkin had suggested that there be no building at all south ofthe new road. If that happened, there would be a large vacant parcel, and that its disposition would be problematic. It was within the Commission's purview to approve only five buildable lots. Alternatively, the Commission could impose whatever conditions it deemed appropriate, and could require that access could only be from the Hahner property. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Maas, Mr. Roush stated that the share of the lot fees could not be delayed until the sale of the lot. The fees must be paid on all six of the lots upon receipt of the final subdivision map. Mr. Iserson advised that there was an option to have six lots, and that the development of Lot 6 would be delayed until the access to Hahner was provided. The lot would still have value, and that the timing would have to be right for connection to the street system within the Hahner property. He noted that ifMr. McCurdy could work with Mr. Hahner, .~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES August 14, 2002 Page 17